Author
Listed:
- Charles Francalanza
- Emanuela Buttigieg
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to deal with an important element of the whistle-blowing decision, the whistle-blower. It is set within the environment of the small Mediterranean island of Malta. It has two objectives. The first is to identify the more important personality traits of the potential Maltese accountant whistle-blower and the situational factors that mostly affect his/her whistle-blowing decision. The second objective is to develop a regression model that can be used to identify the potential Maltese accountant whistle-blower. Design/methodology/approach - The study is in the form of two e-mail questionnaires sent to Maltese accounting practitioners. Findings - The personality traits of conscientiousness, openness to experience and extraversion and the situational factors of ethical considerations and professional requirements were found to be the more significant. The regression model proved substantially correct in singling out the potential Maltese accountant whistle-blower. Research limitations/implications - The results are based on the replies of respondents to two questionnaires and not actual whistle-blowing behaviour. Also, the propensity to be a whistle-blower or not may not be a constant since it can be affected by shifts in internal attributes and situational factors. Practical implications - Besides academic qualifications, the personality of the individual and his/her potential reaction to the working environment should be given due consideration in the recruitment of accounting staff. Originality/value - The research contributes to the literature on the accountant whistle-blower in a small country setting that is rarely the subject of study.
Suggested Citation
Charles Francalanza & Emanuela Buttigieg, 2016.
"Maltese certified public accountants and whistle-blowing: traits, influences and propensity,"
Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(3), pages 262-284, September.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:jaarpp:v:17:y:2016:i:3:p:262-284
DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-09-2013-0062
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:v:17:y:2016:i:3:p:262-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.