IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jaarpp/v16y2015i2p240-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between recognised intangible assets and voluntary intellectual capital disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Schiemann
  • Kai Richter
  • Thomas Günther

Abstract

Purpose - – The capitalisation of intangible investments is discussed controversially in the financial accounting literature. International accounting standards are concerned with this issue and generally demand more intellectual capital to be recognised on the face of the balance sheet. If investors and analysts already gather monetary information about intangible assets from the financial report and find such information useful, then the necessity to complement such information with voluntary intellectual capital disclosure will diminish. Accordingly, there should be an association between recognised intangible assets and voluntary intellectual capital disclosure. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - – The authors analyse the voluntary disclosure of 264 investor conference and roadshow presentations of German DAX 30 firms in the year 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2007. The authors apply regression models to analyse the association between recognition of intangible assets and voluntary intellectual capital disclosure and control for other determinants of voluntary disclosure. Findings - – The authors find that the magnitude of recognised intangible assets is significantly and negatively associated with the quantity and quality of voluntary intellectual capital disclosure. The authors show that this association is mainly driven by goodwill accounting. In more detailed analyses we find different directions (positive, negative and insignificant) of this relationship for different categories of intellectual capital. Research limitations/implications - – Future studies on voluntary intellectual capital disclosure need to consider recognised intangible assets as a determinant to avoid omitted variable problems. Practical implications - – The authors provide descriptive evidence about voluntary intellectual capital disclosure practice of Germany’s largest firms. Originality/value - – The paper provides primary evidence on the association between recognised intangible assets and voluntary intellectual capital disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Schiemann & Kai Richter & Thomas Günther, 2015. "The relationship between recognised intangible assets and voluntary intellectual capital disclosure," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 240-264, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:v:16:y:2015:i:2:p:240-264
    DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-11-2012-0076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAAR-11-2012-0076/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAAR-11-2012-0076/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JAAR-11-2012-0076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Rieg & Ute Vanini, 2023. "Value relevance of voluntary intellectual capital disclosure: a meta-analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2587-2631, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:v:16:y:2015:i:2:p:240-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.