IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jaarpp/v10y2009i2p109-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of regulatory prescriptions and audit standards on the evolution of forensic accounting in the audit process

Author

Listed:
  • James A. DiGabriele

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine if there is a level of agreement among accounting academics, auditors, and forensic accountants that the current environmental framework created by regulatory and standard setting bodies appears to require a merger of common ground between forensic accounting and auditing. Design/methodology/approach - A survey in the USA is conducted for a random sample of accounting academics, forensic accounting practitioners, and auditors questioning if the addition of forensic accounting proficiency should be part of an auditor's skill set to increase the probability of detecting fraud. Findings - The results indicate that forensic accounting has a place in the audit process and that auditors may need to add some of these skills as the market for audits have changed. Research limitations/implications - The limitation of the current paper which is inherent to survey research is non‐response bias. The only way to evaluate this is to test late responses and compare them to earlier results. There are no significant differences. Future research in this area should progress to experimental designs using foundational forensic procedures in a simulated audit setting to ascertain the success and the proper implementation of these skills in finding financial statement fraud. Practical implications - This paper will increase auditor awareness of the importance of the acquisition of foundational forensic accounting skills that will enhance the likelihood of fraud detection. Originality/value - Professions evolve by way of regulatory, political, and social responses. Although there are some distinct differences between forensic accountants and auditors in the USA, there is enough common ground to answer the call for auditors to be more mindful of finding fraud. This paper intends to draw attention to the fact that foundational forensic accounting skills may represent a paradigm shift for professional skills in the accounting markets.

Suggested Citation

  • James A. DiGabriele, 2009. "Implications of regulatory prescriptions and audit standards on the evolution of forensic accounting in the audit process," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 109-121, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:v:10:y:2009:i:2:p:109-121
    DOI: 10.1108/09675420910984673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09675420910984673/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09675420910984673/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/09675420910984673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lateef Saheed Ademola & Ayoib B. Ch-Ahmad & Oluwatoyin Johnson Muse Popoola, 2017. "The Forensic Accountants' Skills and Ethics on Fraud Prevention in the Nigerian Public Sector," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 3(4), pages 77-85, December.
    2. Hegazy, Sarah & Sangster, Alan & Kotb, Amr, 2017. "Mapping forensic accounting in the UK," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 43-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:v:10:y:2009:i:2:p:109-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.