IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jaarpp/jaar-05-2022-0101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional pressures and strategic response to auditing implementation of sustainable development goals: the role of public sector auditors

Author

Listed:
  • Lexis Alexander Tetteh
  • Cletus Agyenim-Boateng
  • Samuel Nana Yaw Simpson

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to explore the role of public sectors auditors in strategically responding to institutional pressures to conduct a performance audit of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) implementation in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach - To gather in-depth and rich empirical data, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 senior and middle management auditors of Ghana's Supreme Audit Institution (SAI). Findings - The findings indicate that the International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions, the government, auditees, political executives and the Audit Service Board all exert institutional pressure on Ghana's audit of SDG implementation. In response to these pressures, the SAI deploys acquiescence, compromise and manipulation strategies that result in the coupling, and in some cases, the loose coupling of SDG audit practices. Research limitations/implications - Observation method of data collection would have given the researchers first-hand knowledge of the role of auditors, the institutional pressures to SDG audit and the strategic response to the institutional pressures. The authors were unable to accompany the public sector auditors to their field audits. This would have aided in obtaining more detailed empirical data. Practical implications - The findings suggest that external and internal factors affect public sector audit of SDG implementation. Because the SAI of Ghana is dependent on the central government for budgetary allocation and auditees for miscellaneous logistics, it is under coercive pressure to meet rent seeking demands of political executives. As a result, SAIs in emerging economies must revisit the other side of accountability by reinforcing a constructive dialogue with those held accountable, particularly politicians and auditees. Originality/value - This study's contribution is the exploration and application of institutional theory and Oliver (1991) model for responding to institutional pressures to a novel research area, namely, SDG implementation audit by public sector auditors in an emerging economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lexis Alexander Tetteh & Cletus Agyenim-Boateng & Samuel Nana Yaw Simpson, 2022. "Institutional pressures and strategic response to auditing implementation of sustainable development goals: the role of public sector auditors," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 403-423, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-05-2022-0101
    DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-05-2022-0101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAAR-05-2022-0101/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JAAR-05-2022-0101/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JAAR-05-2022-0101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cîmpan Marius & Pacuraru-Ionescu Catalin-Paul & Borlea Sorin Nicolae & Jansen Adela, 2023. "Connections between the Model of the Supreme Public Audit Institution and Some Economic, Social, Political, and Cultural Variables," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 2036-2052, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:jaar-05-2022-0101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.