IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/inmrpp/inmr-08-2018-0058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Auma Ondiek
  • Christopher Moturi

Abstract

Purpose - There has been a high rate of failure among the Living Labs in Kenya resulting in the expected outcomes not fully realized. This paper aims to assess the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya. Design/methodology/approach - Based on the four capital method of sustainable development evaluation framework, data were collected through interviews and questionnaires from innovators, users and employees among the 25 living labs in Kenya. Findings - The research found that some innovators are not familiar with the living labs, the living labs are innovative and prepared to survive in future, some labs have strategic plans on how to pursue future environment and have developed ways of choosing right people to incubate, inability to get enough funding from the host organizations and limited knowledge on the supervision level of the operations. A model is proposed that can be generalized to other living labs in developing countries. Research limitations/implications - The study was done in Nairobi where most of the living labs are situated. Practical implications - The study concludes by emphasizing on the user involvement during innovation process. There is need to expand the capacities of living labs to accommodate more people to ensure more innovations are supported at a time. The senior managers in charge of the living labs should increase the level of supervision to ensure that the labs are effective in their incubation efforts and institutionalize support of the host organization to the labs to ensure continued growth and expansion. Originality/value - The findings of this study are of value to research community, the decision and policymakers as it seeks to document the current status of the living labs in the Kenya

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Auma Ondiek & Christopher Moturi, 2019. "An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya," Innovation & Management Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(4), pages 391-403, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:inmrpp:inmr-08-2018-0058
    DOI: 10.1108/INMR-08-2018-0058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INMR-08-2018-0058/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/INMR-08-2018-0058/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/INMR-08-2018-0058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teresa Kampfmann & Philip Bernert & Daniel J Lang, 2023. "Toward a modular evaluation approach of real-world laboratories: Findings from a literature review," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 128-143.
    2. repec:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:1:p:128-143. is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:inmrpp:inmr-08-2018-0058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.