Author
Listed:
- Olumide Olusegun Olaoye
- Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan
- Mosab I. Tabash
Abstract
Purpose - The objective of the research is threefold. First, the study examines the fiscal policy – income inequality nexus in SA. Second, the study addressed the potential asymmetric effects in fiscal policy – income inequality nexus in SA (i.e. we assessed the effects of fiscal policy on income inequality at different quantiles of the income inequality) using secondary data from 1980–2020. Third, the study also identifies the optimal fiscal policy instrument that achieve the greatest distributional objectives. Design/methodology/approach - The study adopts the traditional ordinary least square (OLS) and the innovative Quantile estimation techniques. Findings - The study found that fiscal policy marginally reduces the income inequality at the lower quantiles (t: 0.05). Specifically, the results show that government spending on health and education reduces income inequality at the lower quantiles (t: 0.05; t: 0.25), albeit exerts a statistically weak impact. On the other hand, the results show that at the upper quantiles, fiscal policy has no statistically significant impact on income inequality. However, we do not find either direct or indirect tax to have any impact on income inequality at any conventional level of significance. This suggests that government spending on health and education have the greater potential to reduce income inequality in South Africa. The research and policy implications are discussed. Originality/value - The study addressed the asymmetric phenomenon in income inequality-fiscal policy nexus in South Africa. Peer review - The peer review history for this article is available at:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-12-2023-0956
Suggested Citation
Olumide Olusegun Olaoye & Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan & Mosab I. Tabash, 2024.
"Fiscal policy and income inequality in SA: a quantile regression,"
International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 698-714, August.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijsepp:ijse-12-2023-0956
DOI: 10.1108/IJSE-12-2023-0956
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:ijse-12-2023-0956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.