IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijmpps/01437720510597676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency and productivity of employment offices: evidence from Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Rikard Althin
  • Lars Behrenz

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to measure the efficiency and productivity of Swedish employment offices. Design/methodology/approach - Using four inputs, five outputs, and two quality attributes the efficiency and productivity of 253 Swedish employment offices are evaluated using models of relative technical efficiency and Malmquist productivity indices. The results are computed as solutions to linear programming problems for the 1992‐1995 periods. Findings - Results of the study find that the mean efficiency across offices varies between 74 and 78 percent. The mean productivity change demonstrates a decrease of 11 percent during the 1992‐1993 period, and an increase of 7 and 13 percents during 1993‐1994 and 1994‐1995 respectively. Research limitations/implications - Different background characteristics of job seekers could possibly bias the result for some of the offices. Further research could use a dynamic model where different job seeker characteristics are taken into consideration. Practical implications - The paper provides an opportunity for inefficient/low productivity offices to study how offices identified as more efficient are producing their services. Originality/value - This paper demonstrates how efficiency and productivity could be measured in a multi‐input, multi‐output employment office service sector setting where quality aspects are allowed to play a part.

Suggested Citation

  • Rikard Althin & Lars Behrenz, 2005. "Efficiency and productivity of employment offices: evidence from Sweden," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(2), pages 196-206, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijmpps:01437720510597676
    DOI: 10.1108/01437720510597676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01437720510597676/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/01437720510597676/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/01437720510597676?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijmpps:01437720510597676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.