IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijmfpp/v12y2016i1p25-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liquidity, investor sentiment and price discount of SEOs in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Ebenezer Asem
  • Jessica Chung
  • Xin Cui
  • Gloria Y Tian

Abstract

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to empirically test whether stock liquidity and investor sentiment have interactive effects on seasoned equity offers (SEOs) price discounts in Australia. Design/methodology/approach - – The authors focus on the implicit cost borne by firms when issuing seasoned equity capital. This cost is measured as the relative difference between the SEO offer price and the last close price prior to the announcement of the issue. The primary measure of investor sentiment is a composite index constructed similar to that in Baker and Wurgler (2007). Findings - – The results show that, in periods of deteriorating investor sentiment, the increase in SEO price discounts for firms with illiquid stocks is larger than the corresponding increase for firms with liquid stocks. This suggests that, as sentiment wanes, investors become even more concerned about illiquidity, leading to even greater required compensation for holding illiquid assets. The authors find that information asymmetry is positively related to SEO price discounts but this relation is not affected by changing investor sentiment. Research limitations/implications - – Collectively, the empirical results provide support for the argument that price discount of SEOs represents compensation to investors for bearing costs associated with illiquidity. The results also lend some support to the behavioural argument that pricing of equity offers is dependent upon investor sentiment, particularly for firms with illiquid stocks. Practical implications - – The ability for firms to raise capital in a cost-effective manner is critical for firm growth and stability. Investors require compensation for bearing the costs of illiquidity of their investments in equity. Accordingly, firms need to be conscious of their stocks’ existing liquidity and its influence on the cost of raising additional capital which, in turn, affects their operational stability and investment opportunities. Social implications - – Ultimately, the implications of this study will assist firms in capital-raising decisions, investors in making portfolio investment decisions, and investment banks in setting offer prices on equity issues. Originality/value - – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine the interaction between investor sentiment and SEO price discounts in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Ebenezer Asem & Jessica Chung & Xin Cui & Gloria Y Tian, 2016. "Liquidity, investor sentiment and price discount of SEOs in Australia," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(1), pages 25-51, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijmfpp:v:12:y:2016:i:1:p:25-51
    DOI: 10.1108/IJMF-10-2013-0106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJMF-10-2013-0106/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJMF-10-2013-0106/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJMF-10-2013-0106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heshmatollah Asgari & Hamed Najafi, 2020. "The Linkage between Sentiments and Stock Market Dynamics New Evidence from Iran," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(2), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Haiyuan Yin & Xingying Wu & Sophie X Kong, 2022. "Daily investor sentiment, order flow imbalance and stock liquidity: evidence from the Chinese stock market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4816-4836, October.
    3. Pedro Manuel Nogueira Reis & Carlos Pinho, 2021. "A Reappraisal of the Causal Relationship between Sentiment Proxies and Stock Returns," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 420-442, October.
    4. Jiang, Shanshan & Fan, Hong, 2018. "Credit risk contagion coupling with sentiment contagion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 186-202.
    5. Reis, Pedro Manuel Nogueira & Pinho, Carlos, 2020. "A new European investor sentiment index (EURsent) and its return and volatility predictability," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    6. Weidong Zhang & Jenny Jing Wang & Guomin Luo & Yanqi Sun, 2021. "Tunnelling in asset‐injecting private placements: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5501-5522, December.
    7. Nufazil Altaf Ahangar, 2021. "Stock liquidity and corporate debt maturity structure: Evidences from Indian firms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1754-1764, October.
    8. Daniel Perez-Liston & Daniel Huerta-Sanchez & Juan Gutierrez, 2018. "Do Domestic Sentiment and the Spillover of US Investor Sentiment Impact Mexican Stock Market Returns?," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 17(2_suppl), pages 185-212, August.
    9. Manjit Kaur Sidhu & Parmjit Kaur, 2019. "Effect of corporate governance on stock market liquidity: empirical evidence from Indian companies," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(3), pages 197-218, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijmfpp:v:12:y:2016:i:1:p:25-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.