IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijmfpp/ijmf-09-2017-0193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do culture and governance structure influence extent of corporate risk disclosure?

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Kwame Agyei-Mensah
  • Samuel Buertey

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to study the relationship between culture, corporate governance (CG) variables and corporate risk reporting practices of listed companies in Nigeria and South Africa, two large African economies at the south of the Sahara. Design/methodology/approach - The study uses 500 firm-year observations for the period of 2013–2017 for firms listed on the Lagos and Johannesburg Stock Exchanges. Descriptive analysis was performed to provide the background statistics of the variables examined. This was followed by regression analysis, which constitutes the main data analysis. Findings - The results indicate that power distance is negatively associated with the corporate risk disclosure (CRD). This implies that organizations where power distance is high are characterized by lower CRD and vice versa. From the analysis, two factors, namely, institutional ownership and profitability, were found to explain sample firms’ risk disclosure practices as they are positively and statistically related to CRD. Originality/value - This study is one of the few to measure the influence of culture and CG on CRD in Sub-Sahara Africa. Understanding the drivers for firms to disclose risk-related information may assist regulators and standards setters in promoting both the spread and the improvement of such disclosures through the issuance of CG codes and reporting guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Kwame Agyei-Mensah & Samuel Buertey, 2019. "Do culture and governance structure influence extent of corporate risk disclosure?," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 315-334, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijmfpp:ijmf-09-2017-0193
    DOI: 10.1108/IJMF-09-2017-0193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJMF-09-2017-0193/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJMF-09-2017-0193/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJMF-09-2017-0193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak & Kristina Rudžionienė, 2022. "Corporate COVID-19-Related Risk Disclosure in the Electricity Sector: Evidence of Public Companies from Central and Eastern Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. AlKhawaldeh Afaf Mohammed & Saaydah Mansour Ibrahim, 2022. "Determinants of Corporate Risk Disclosure for Non- Financial Companies Listed on Amman Stock Exchange," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 152-177.
    3. Fouad Jamaani & Manal Alidarous & Abdullah Al-Awadhi, 2021. "The Early Impact of Government Financial Intervention Policies and Cultural Secrecy on Stock Market Returns During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From Developing Countries," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(2), pages 401-416, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Culture; Nigeria; South Africa; Financial reporting; Risk disclosure; G3; M1; M2; M4;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics
    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijmfpp:ijmf-09-2017-0193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.