Author
Listed:
- Bashir Olanrewaju Ganiyu
- Julius Ayodeji Fapohunda
- Rainer Haldenwang
Abstract
Purpose - This study aims to identify and establish effective housing financing concepts to be adopted by government in achieving its mandate of providing sustainable affordable housing for the poor to decrease the building of shacks, as well as proposing solutions to the housing deficit in South Africa. A rise in demand and shortage in supply of housing calls for the need to address issues of affordable housing in South Africa, and developing countries in general, to ensure a stable and promising future for poor families. Design/methodology/approach - Literature has revealed that the South African government, at all levels, accorded high priority to the provision of low-cost housing. Thus, government has adopted subsidy payment as a method of financing affordable housing to ensure that houses are allocated free to the beneficiaries. This also addresses the historically race-based inequalities of the past, but unfortunately, this has not been fully realised. This study uses a sequential mixed method approach, where private housing developers and general building contractors were the research participants. The qualitative data were analysed using a case-by-case analysis, and quantitative data were analysed using a descriptive statistical technique on SPSS. Findings - The results of the qualitative analysis reveal a gross abuse of the housing subsidies system by the beneficiaries of government-funded housing in South Africa. This is evident from illegal sale of the houses below market value. This has led to a continual building of shacks and an increased number of people on the housing waiting list instead of a decrease in the housing deficit. The results from quantitative analysis affirm the use of “Mortgage Payment Subsidies, Mortgage Payment Deductions, Down-Payment Grant and Mortgage Interest Deductions” as viable alternatives to subsidy payment currently in use to finance affordable housing projects by the South African Government. Practical implications - At the moment, the focus of the South African National Government is continual provision of free housing to the historically disadvantage citizens, but the housing financing method being used encourages unapproved transfer of ownership in the affordable housing sector. This study thus recommends the use of an all-inclusive housing financing method that requires a monetary contribution from the beneficiaries to enable them take control of the process. Originality/value - The relational interface model proposed in this study will reduce pressure on government budgetary provision for housing and guarantee quick return of private developers’ investment in housing. Government must, as a matter of urgency, launch a continuous awareness programme to educate the low-income population on the value and the long-term benefits of the housing.
Suggested Citation
Bashir Olanrewaju Ganiyu & Julius Ayodeji Fapohunda & Rainer Haldenwang, 2017.
"Sustainable housing financing model to reduce South Africa housing deficit,"
International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 410-430, June.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijhmap:ijhma-07-2016-0051
DOI: 10.1108/IJHMA-07-2016-0051
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Emmanuel Joseph Odoyi & Kirsikka Riekkinen, 2022.
"Housing Policy: An Analysis of Public Housing Policy Strategies for Low-Income Earners in Nigeria,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, February.
- Mahmoud Sodangi & Zaheer Abbas Kazmi, 2020.
"Integrated Evaluation of the Impediments to the Adoption of Coconut Palm Wood as a Sustainable Material for Building Construction,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
- Princess Makhosazan Dastile & Prisca Simbanegavi, 2022.
"Adapting Netherlands 'Starterslening' Model To Improve The Current Finance Linked Individual Subsidy Scheme In South Africa,"
AfRES
2022-055, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijhmap:ijhma-07-2016-0051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.