Author
Listed:
- Boudhayan Ganguly
- Sahana Roy Chowdhury
- Rajarshi Ghosh
- Dona Ghosh
Abstract
Purpose - This study aims to help MSMEs in understanding the barriers to adoption of AI and how they are interlinked with each other. There is a general consensus amongst researchers and corporates that artificial intelligence (AI) can help in better and faster decision-making. However, many medium, small and micro enterprises (MSMEs) have not adopted AI in the context of automation. Design/methodology/approach - The authors have assigned weights to the barriers of AI implementation by using Best Worst Method (BWM). In this study, the authors argue that the more alternatives there are, the greater the chances of making an error in judgment. This is a drawback of the traditional comparison matrices that are used for assigning weights to attributes/alternatives/factors. Subsequently, we have computed the influence of the barriers on each other using the DEMATEL method. This helped us understand what the drivers of the bottlenecks are and the interlinkages between them. Findings - The barriers identified are top management support, change resistance from employees, lack of knowledge about AI in automation, Lack of resources to implement the solution, uncertainty regarding the future of benefits, perception of job loss and subsequent conflicts and lack of perseverance. Price of automation, uncertainty regarding future and top management support were identified as factors that drive other bottlenecks. Practical implications - The study has theoretical implications, as it corroborates the technology organization environment (TOE) framework in the context of AI automation in MSMEs. This is the first study of this type, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, on MSMEs in India. Factors such as lack of top management support, change resistance, perseverance and price of the automation can be viewed as organizational blocks to AI implementation. Lack of knowledge about AI in automation and Lack of resources are technology-related barriers, whereas uncertainty regarding the future of technology and job loss are related to the environment. This has implications for the top management of MSMEs. The results did show that some bottlenecks act as drivers of other bottlenecks. Thus, the MSMEs, which inherently have limited resources, can prioritize their focus on the ones that have high driving power. Originality/value - The authors have used the TOE framework to refer to the technological, organizational and environmental factors that affect the decisions to adopt a new technology. The decision of the business and government, to participate in the diffusion of AI, may be contingent upon monitoring the bottlenecks and designing mechanisms to enhance use of AI for automation by MSMEs across India. Thus, this study has wide policy implications.
Suggested Citation
Boudhayan Ganguly & Sahana Roy Chowdhury & Rajarshi Ghosh & Dona Ghosh, 2025.
"What hinders AI adoption in MSMEs of India? – Importance and interlinkages between the barriers,"
Indian Growth and Development Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 72-92, March.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:igdrpp:igdr-05-2024-0070
DOI: 10.1108/IGDR-05-2024-0070
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
AI;
Automation;
Barriers to adoption;
BWM;
DEMATEL;
TOE framework;
C18;
M21;
O14;
O32;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
- M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
- O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
- O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:igdrpp:igdr-05-2024-0070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.