Author
Listed:
- Auwal Adam Sa’ad
- Aishath Muneeza
- Razali Haron
- Anwar Hasan Abdullah Othman
Abstract
Purpose - This paper identified theṣukūkstructure suitable for deficit financing during the COVID-19 crisis. The study also explored the relevant Sharīʿah contracts that could be utilized to issueṣukūkthat is suitable for various jurisdictions and corporations in handling deficit financing during the COVID-19 crisis. Design/methodology/approach - The authors have adopted a qualitative research approach in which primary and secondary sources available on the subject were reviewed, especially a number of cases related toṣukūkstructures prior to and during the COVID-19 crisis and analyzed their performances and drawn their conclusions. Findings - The outcome of this paper suggests that certainṣukūkstructures used during the COVID-19 crisis aimed primarily at financing deficit have been successful. Furthermore, theseṣukūkstructures are relied very much on the obligator’s/issuer’s cash flow position. It has been revealed that if theṣukūkis structured on equity-based contracts with lower repayment amount or no payment, it would not trigger default because the nature of thisṣukūkis the sharing of profit and loss, in accordance with a Sharīʿah rule that there will be compensation for any loss only if deliberate and notable negligence is proven. However, if it is debt based or ijarah and wakalah contracts, then the payment toṣukūkholders ought to be made as agreed and if not, it will trigger default. This payment is to be made from the cash flow of the issuer and if there is an issue in the cash flow of the issuer due to COVID-19, consent from theṣukūkholders needs to be obtained to reschedule payment as found in the case of the Garuda Indonesiaṣukūk. However, as found in MASB’s IMTNṣukūkcase, if the cash flow of the company is good, then the chances of default are very slim. However, so far, three newṣukūkin the middle of COVID-19 were issued, one by a corporation and two issued by a sovereign, one of which addresses the liquidity issues during the pandemic, and all these proved thatṣukūkis definitely a viable alternative mode for deficit financing and a reliable option during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research limitations/implications - This paper looked into theṣukūkstructure, especially theṣukūkwhich are yet to mature and the newṣukūkissued during the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Practical implications - It is anticipated that the outcome of this research will assist the stakeholders inṣukūkmarkets to understand theṣukūkimpact on COVID-19 related deficit financing and suggest various structures that could be utilized in theṣukūkmarket in an unprecedented situation such as the COVID-19 economic distress. Social implications - Looking at the social aspect ofṣukūkmarkets, this paper has endeavored to provide solutions to the financing of deficit for social well-being as a tool to provide relief and social stability in the lives of the people. Originality/value - The novel COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented economic difficulties and market distress on a global scale; and this research sought to identify the relevantṣukūkstructures to be used for deficit financing during the pandemic crisis, especially theṣukūkwhich are yet to mature and newṣukūkissued during the pandemic crisis. The former includes HDFCMuḍārabah ṣukūk(2019) Maldives and MAHBṣukūk/IMTN program (2010) Malaysia, while the latter includes IsDB Trust Certificates, Phase 2 of the tranches (2020), the Federal Government of Nigeria Roadṣukūk(May, 2020) and Sharj’ah Government two billion Dirhamṣukūk(June, 2020).
Suggested Citation
Auwal Adam Sa’ad & Aishath Muneeza & Razali Haron & Anwar Hasan Abdullah Othman, 2022.
"Ṣukūkstructure for deficit financing during COVID-19 crisis,"
Islamic Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(1), pages 23-41, September.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:iespps:ies-01-2021-0007
DOI: 10.1108/IES-01-2021-0007
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
Ṣukūk;
COVID-19 crisis;
Deficit financing;
G18;
E62;
K16;
K11;
K73;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
- E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
- K16 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Election Law
- K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:iespps:ies-01-2021-0007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.