IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/cfripp/cfri-04-2020-0037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of model bias in predicting volatility: evidence from the US equity markets

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Li
  • Lian Luo
  • Chao Liang
  • Feng Ma

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore whether the out-of-sample model bias plays an important role in predicting volatility. Design/methodology/approach - Under the heterogeneous autoregressive realized volatility (HAR-RV) framework, we analyze the predictive power of out-of-sample model bias for the realized volatility (RV) of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI) and the S&P 500 (SPX) indices from in-sample and out-of-sample perspectives respectively. Findings - The in-sample results reveal that the prediction model including the model bias can obtain biggerR2, and the out-of-sample empirical results based on several evaluation methods suggest that the prediction model incorporating model bias can improve forecast accuracy for the RV of the DJI and the SPX indices. That is, model bias can enhance the predictability of original HAR family models. Originality/value - The author introduce out-of-sample model bias into HAR family models to enhance model capability in predicting realized volatility.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Li & Lian Luo & Chao Liang & Feng Ma, 2020. "The role of model bias in predicting volatility: evidence from the US equity markets," China Finance Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 140-155, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:cfripp:cfri-04-2020-0037
    DOI: 10.1108/CFRI-04-2020-0037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CFRI-04-2020-0037/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CFRI-04-2020-0037/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/CFRI-04-2020-0037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Houjian & Zhou, Deheng & Hu, Jiayu & Li, Junwen & Su, Mengying & Guo, Lili, 2023. "Forecasting the realized volatility of Energy Stock Market: A multimodel comparison," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Realized volatility; Model bias; Volatility forecasting; Equity markets; C22; C52; C55;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:cfripp:cfri-04-2020-0037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.