IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/caerpp/caer-07-2016-0098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can relationship bring more provision in rural public goods? Empirical evidence from rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuxin Wang
  • Qing Liu
  • Yanrui Wu
  • Huaqing Wu

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate how different types of the village relationship influence different types of public goods provision in rural China. Design/methodology/approach - The three components (clan-based relationship, neighborhood relationship and external relationship) were derived by employing factor analysis. The simultaneous discrete choice model was used to estimate the influence of these components on public goods provision, using the survey data from the China Household Income Project conducted in 2007. Findings - The findings indicate that considering different components of village relationship allows for a better understanding of the public good provision. The results indicate that the neighborhood relationship has a significantly positive effect on rural public goods provision, particularly on water conservancy and irrigation, while the external relationship has a significantly positive effect on all types of public goods. Practical implications - Local public goods provision is the core of the new rural construction in China. These findings imply that relationship in villages plays a vital role in the provision of public goods and is necessary in the construction of the new harmonious countryside in China. The results also have implications for rural public goods provision in other developing countries. Originality/value - To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to quantitatively model the impact of different relationships on public goods provision at the rural level. A consideration of the different components in village relationship allows for a more precise understanding of the pubic goods provision in the village.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuxin Wang & Qing Liu & Yanrui Wu & Huaqing Wu, 2017. "Can relationship bring more provision in rural public goods? Empirical evidence from rural China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 48-61, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:caerpp:caer-07-2016-0098
    DOI: 10.1108/CAER-07-2016-0098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CAER-07-2016-0098/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/CAER-07-2016-0098/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/CAER-07-2016-0098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuxin Wang & Jinping Xiong & Wenlong Li & Ming Na & Mei Yao, 2020. "The Effect of Social Capital on Environmental Pollution in China—Suppression or Promotion?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Lili Li & Zhonggen Zhang & Changluan Fu, 2020. "The subjective well-being effect of public goods provided by village collectives: Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Yuxin Wang & Wenlong Li & Jinping Xiong & Ying Li & Huaqing Wu, 2019. "Effect of Land Expropriation on Land-Lost Farmers’ Health: Empirical Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:caerpp:caer-07-2016-0098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.