Author
Abstract
Purpose - Upholding assessment ethics are common concerns during annual public examination performance appraisal. Previous studies have focused more on examination stakeholder: testees outside proctors however, assessment ethics cannot be studied excluding proctors variables therefore, the study investigated consistency of a structural equation modelling of security, environment, professionalism, testing and assessment ethics. Design/methodology/approach - Ex-post facto design was adopted. Simple random sampling technique was employed to choose 90 proctors drawn from 45 colleges. Proctors Examination Ethics Questionnaire (reliability = 0.86) was used to collect data for the study. Data collected were analysed using path analysis at 0.05 significant levels. Findings - Out of the six hypothesised paths significantly explaining the consistency of the causal model. Test security, environment and professionalism accounted for both direct and indirect effects on assessment ethics. All model fit indices were established to explain testing and assessment model. Research limitations/implications - Few proctor variables were studied, therefore assessment ethics may not be explained other than through proctor variables considered in this study. Practical implications - Assessment ethics may not be violated if test security, testing environment and professionalism are not cared for during test administration as shown in the study. Social implications - It added to knowledge base in ethical areas of assessment, a 21st-century proctors in upholding testing and assessment ethics, security, environment and professionalism are to be considered. Originality/value - There was a positive causal effect of security, environment and professionalism on testing and assessment ethics among proctors in public examinations.
Suggested Citation
Afeez Tunde Jinadu, 2023.
"Causal modelling of testing and assessment ethics among proctors of public examinations in Oyo state,"
Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 42(3), pages 660-669, June.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:agjsrp:agjsr-01-2023-0017
DOI: 10.1108/AGJSR-01-2023-0017
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:agjsrp:agjsr-01-2023-0017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.