IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/aaajpp/aaaj-07-2021-5376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing shared service centres in Big 4 audit firms: an exploratory study guided by institutional theory

Author

Listed:
  • Ewald Aschauer
  • Reiner Quick

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to investigate why and how shared service centres (SSCs) are implemented as well as how they affect audit firm practice and audit quality. Design/methodology/approach - In this qualitative study guided by the theoretical framework of institutional theory, the authors conducted 25 semi-structured interviews in seven European countries, including 16 interviews with audit partners from Big 4 firms, 6 with audit team members, 2 with interviewees from second-tier audit firms and 1 with a member of an oversight body. Findings - The authors show that the central rationale for audit firms to implement SSCs is economic rather than external legitimacy. The authors find that SSC implementation has substantial effects on audit practices, particularly those related to standardisation, coordination and monitoring activities. The authors also highlight the potential impacts on audit quality. Originality/value - By exploring the motivation for and effects of SSC implementation amongst audit firms, the authors offer insights into the best practices related to subsequent change processes and audit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewald Aschauer & Reiner Quick, 2024. "Implementing shared service centres in Big 4 audit firms: an exploratory study guided by institutional theory," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(9), pages 1-28, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:aaajpp:aaaj-07-2021-5376
    DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-07-2021-5376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2021-5376/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2021-5376/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2021-5376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:aaajpp:aaaj-07-2021-5376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.