IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/aaajpp/aaaj-01-2019-030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

100 PhD rules of the game to successfully complete a doctoral dissertation

Author

Listed:
  • Niamh M. Brennan

Abstract

Purpose - A doctoral dissertation is a challenging undertaking requiring determination, persistence and resilience over a long time: four to six years’ study or more. These PhD “rules of the game” are intended to help students successfully navigate this challenge. Design/methodology/approach - The author has assembled 100 PhD rules of the game from the author’s work over many years with masters and doctoral students. Each rule is accompanied by some further short guidance. Additional citations are included directing readers to resources embellishing the 100 PhD rules of the game. Findings - The paper documents 100 PhD rules of the game. Research limitations/implications - There are many other PhD rules of the game not included in the author’s list of 100 PhD rules of the game. Originality/value - This paper is a one-stop-shop brief introduction to the author’s 100 PhD rules of the game.

Suggested Citation

  • Niamh M. Brennan, 2019. "100 PhD rules of the game to successfully complete a doctoral dissertation," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 364-376, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:aaajpp:aaaj-01-2019-030
    DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-01-2019-030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2019-030/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2019-030/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2019-030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:aaajpp:aaaj-01-2019-030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.