IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v12y1992i2p296-304id1419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Many Methods is the Method: Regarding Pluralism

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Maria Bianchi

Abstract

This paper focuses on the thesis of pluralism, proposed by Caldwell as an adequatemethodology for Economics. It compares pluralism and the position advocated by NevilleKeynes 100 years ago, when Economics was passing through a similarly difficult periodof its history, characterized by a conflict between antagonistic lines of thought. JEL Classification: B41; B20.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Maria Bianchi, 1992. "Many Methods is the Method: Regarding Pluralism," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 12(2), pages 296-304.
    • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:12:y:1992:i:2:p:296-304:id:1419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/1419/1405
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic methodology; pluralism; history of economic thought; Neville Keynes; Caldwell;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • B20 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:12:y:1992:i:2:p:296-304:id:1419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.