IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v21y2024i2p251-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critique of the U.S. Intelligence Community's Diversity Claims

Author

Listed:
  • John A. Gentry

Abstract

‘Diversity, equity, and inclusion’ (DEI) initiatives have become widespread in the U.S. government, including the intelligence community (IC). Senior IC leaders claim that DEI policies improve the operational performance of agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency. This article criticizes these claims, shows them to be unsupported by evidence and simply skimpy, and goes further by briefly explaining how DEI policies damage the performance of U.S. intelligence agencies in five major ways. This study of the impact of DEI on a major component of U.S. national security establishment complements studies of the effects of DEI on businesses and universities.

Suggested Citation

  • John A. Gentry, 2024. "Critique of the U.S. Intelligence Community's Diversity Claims," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 21(2), pages 251–273-2, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:251-273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/File+download/1326/GentrySept2024.pdf?mimetype=pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/1371
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Diversity; DEI; intelligence; forecasting; CIA; Obama; Trump; Biden;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • P3 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:251-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jason Briggeman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.