IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v19y2022i2p247-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Free Markets Require Good Governments, for the Sake of Liberalism

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Ott

Abstract

The Fraser Institute measures economic freedom in nations with five items and reports summary scores in the Economic Freedom of the World Index (EFW, the Index). Ryan Murphy (2022b) argues on behalf of the Institute that Economic Freedom is defined in a stipulative way as a formative concept and is insensitive to validity issues. This is correct, but it is informative to see what happens if we define economic freedom as a theoretical or reflective concept instead. If we do, we see that the Institute is measuring two different phenomena that can be denoted—arguably—as two types of freedom. The first freedom can be interpreted—arguably—as ‘freedom by smaller government’ reflecting low levels of government activities as measured by size of government. Nations get higher summary scores if such levels are low. The second freedom, as measured by the other items, can be interpreted—arguably—as ‘freedom as the opportunity to choose.’ Nations get higher scores as a result of specific government activities creating more options for economic transactions. These two types of freedom are contradictory, because higher levels of such specific activities contribute simultaneously to lower and higher summary scores. If the one goes up the other goes down, and vice versa. It is an option to report about size of government and the other items separately as additional information. This will enhance the usefulness and the importance of the Index. This argument is independent of the data. If we look at the data we see that higher levels of government activities go together with higher scores in the other items. We must be critical about governments, but should acknowledge this positive correlation. We should also pay attention to the quality of government as a crucial condition for freedom, defined in whatever way.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Ott, 2022. "Free Markets Require Good Governments, for the Sake of Liberalism," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 19(2), pages 247–257-2, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:247-257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/File+download/1241/OttSept2022.pdf?mimetype=pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/1283
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Ott, 2018. "Measuring Economic Freedom: Better Without Size of Government," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 479-498, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryan H. Murphy, 2022. "Economic Freedom without Quality of Government," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 37(Winter 20), pages 21-42.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Bergh & Christian Bjørnskov, 2021. "Does economic freedom boost growth for everyone?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 170-186, May.
    2. Sheila Killian & Philip O'Regan & Ruth Lynch & Martin Laheen & Dionysios Karavidas, 2022. "Regulating havens: The role of hard and soft governance of tax experts in conditions of secrecy and low regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 722-737, July.
    3. Justin T. Callais & Vincent Geloso, 2023. "Intergenerational income mobility and economic freedom," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 732-753, January.
    4. Marson, Marta & Migheli, Matteo & Saccone, Donatella, 2022. "Free to Die: Economic Freedoms and Influenza Mortality," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202210, University of Turin.
    5. Megan V. Teague & Virgil Henry Storr & Rosemarie Fike, 2020. "Economic freedom and materialism: an empirical analysis," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 1-44, March.
    6. Donatella Saccone & Matteo Migheli, 2022. "Free to escape? Economic freedoms, growth and poverty traps," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 1518-1554, August.
    7. Thomas R. Scholz, 2024. "Improving the measurement of economic freedom by replacing government size with government effectiveness," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 21(1), pages 3-33, June.
    8. Ryan H. Murphy, 2019. "The state economic modernity index: an index of state building, state size and scope, and state economic power," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 73-101, March.
    9. Ryan H. Murphy, 2022. "On Whether the Size of Government Belongs in Economic Freedom Indices," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 19(1), pages 1-47–57, March.
    10. Jan Ott, 2022. "Leave Size of Government Out of the Measurement of Economic Freedom—Put Quality of Government In," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 19(1), pages 1-58–64, March.
    11. Ryan H. Murphy, 2022. "Economic Freedom without Quality of Government," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 37(Winter 20), pages 21-42.
    12. Jan Ott & Fred MacMahon, 2019. "Is Freedom Just About the Absence of Inhibitions, or Also About the Availability of Options?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 305-309, February.
    13. Pál Czeglédi, 2020. "The consistency of market beliefs as a determinant of economic freedom," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 227-258, June.
    14. Rosolino A. Candela & Vincent Geloso, 2021. "Economic freedom, pandemics, and robust political economy," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 87(4), pages 1250-1266, April.
    15. Germà Bel, 2022. "Beyond government size: Types of government intervention and corruption," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1174-1196, October.
    16. Vincent Geloso & Kelly Hyde & Ilia Murtazashvili, 2022. "Pandemics, economic freedom, and institutional trade-offs," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 37-61, August.
    17. Ryan H. Murphy, 2019. "The long‐run effect of government ideology on economic freedom," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 101-114, February.
    18. Murphy, Ryan H., 2020. "The Quality of Legal Systems and Property Rights by State: A Ranking and Their Implications for Economic Freedom," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 50(1), April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic freedom; conceptualization; measurement; validity; possibility to choose; opportunity to choose; quality of government; principles of good governance; liberalism; Russia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General
    • P10 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:247-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jason Briggeman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.