IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v14y2017i1p2-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examination of Dr Smith's System

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Brown

Abstract

Reproduced here is a selection of Thomas Brown’s Lectures on the Philosophy of the Human Mind, first published in Edinburgh in 1820, on Adam Smith’s The Theory of Moral Sentiments. The selection is representative of numerous criticisms that came forth in the decades following Smith’s death in 1790. Brown says that Smith holds that our moral sentiments “are supposed to flow from sympathy.” Brown, however, objects: “In the number of petty affairs which are hourly before our eyes, what sympathy is felt”? Moreover, sympathy is “one of the most irregular and seemingly capricious of principles.” And even if we were to grant that sympathy were “as universal as [Smith] contends,” the sentiment that is shared must exist as our own sentiment prior to any experience of sympathy, just as a source must produce a sound before that sound can be echoed in a canyon, or as an object must produce an image before that image can be reflected in a mirror. Brown thus charges Smith with circularity. There must be, apart from sympathy, he says, “an independent capacity of moral emotion” based on “moral notions of what is right and wrong.” Moral sentiment, then, is not dependent on sympathy.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Brown, 2017. "Examination of Dr Smith's System," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 14(1), pages 1-2–21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:14:y:2017:i:1:p:2-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/File+download/964/BrownJan2017.pdf?mimetype=pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/1061
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenn R. Morrow, 1927. "Adam Smith: Moralist and Philosopher," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(3), pages 321-321.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel B. Klein, 2018. "Dissing The Theory of Moral Sentiments : Twenty-Six Critics, from 1765 to 1949," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 15(2), pages 201–254-2, May.
    2. Scott Drylie, 2020. "Professional Scholarship from 1893 to 2020 on Adam Smith’s Views on School Funding: A Heterodox Examination," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17(2), pages 350–391-3, September.
    3. Wagner-Tsukamoto Sigmund, 2013. "The Adam Smith Problem Revisited: A Methodological Resolution," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 63-99, September.
    4. Betül SARI-AKSAKAL, 2024. "From Classical Political Economics to Neoclassical (Mainstream) Economics: The Ideological Reproduction and Depoliticization Process of Economics," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 32(60).
    5. Drylie, Scott, 2021. "Adam Smith on schooling: A classical liberal rereading," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 748-770.
    6. repec:hal:journl:dumas-00910208 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Adam Smith; sympathy; moral sentiments;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:14:y:2017:i:1:p:2-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jason Briggeman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.