IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eis/articl/107cullis.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Welfare Economics of Public Sector Targets: Towards an Expenditure Constitution

Author

Listed:
  • J Cullis
  • P Jones

Abstract

With the advent of New Labour, numerical targets have become ubiquitous in the public sector. They are used to monitor and assess performance by government agencies; but how helpful are targets if couched only in numerical terms? In this paper the proposition is that targets must be set in context: targets must be set with reference to a social welfare function. Pressures in political markets are quite different to incentive structures that ensure that targets will maximise welfare. If targets are inappropriate in Paretian terms, welfare loss might be magnified, the more successfully government agencies hit targets. Misallocation of resources is gauged against a Paretian benchmark and illustrated with reference to waiting in the NHS. Analysis of a welfare critique of target-setting suggests a policy rule capable of mitigating distortion.

Suggested Citation

  • J Cullis & P Jones, 2007. "The Welfare Economics of Public Sector Targets: Towards an Expenditure Constitution," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eis:articl:107cullis
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economicissues.org.uk/Files/Cullis.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elsa Marques & Sian Noble & Ashley W. Blom & William Hollingworth, 2014. "Disclosing Total Waiting Times For Joint Replacement: Evidence From The English Nhs Using Linked Hes Data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(7), pages 806-820, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eis:articl:107cullis. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Wheatley (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bsntuuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.