Author
Abstract
The article analyzes the impact of Ukraine's accession to WTO on the development of this country's meat livestock breeding. Taking into account the restrictions as to the state support of meat livestock breeding with measures of the WTO ""yellow box"", there are recommendations have been developed on the use of various ""green box"" measures to support the domestic producers. It is established that the protection level of the domestic beef market, after Ukraine's accession to WTO, considerably declined due to the following reasons: (1) decreased rate of import duty to 15%; (2) transition to ad valorem duty rate, which is less efficient to protect domestic producers during the most vulnerable for them periods of price decline on the world markets; (3) abandonment of differentiated rates of the duty tariff in the commodity groups of fresh, cooled and frozen beef, which used to protect Ukraine's domestic market from imports of cheap low quality raw meat. The article shows, that the negative impact of decline of the level of tariff protection on the development of the meat livestock breeding sector was partly mitigated by the greater decrease in the rates of import duty On the competing produce of pork and poultry/ As a result, the imports of the above mentioned meat types, after Ukraine's accession to WTO, grew much more rapidly. A comparative analysis of the levels of tariff protection of meat livestock breeding in the countries, which are net importers of beef, and those having their own meat livestock breeding shows an asymmetry in the tariff protection Ukraine's beef market and that of those countries, which consists in: (1) a lower rate of import duty in Ukraine; (2) lack of the possibility to use specific, mixed or combined tariffs; (3) lack of the possibility to vary the level of import duty by tariff lines within a commodity group; (4) lack of the possibility to quote imports. All that causes the need of constant monitoring of the beef market in order to reveal threats to domestic producers due to the growth of imports and timely use of WTO's special mechanisms, such as protective, anti-dumping or compensatory ones.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eip:journl:y:2013:i:1:p:97-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Bazhal (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://eip.org.ua/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.