IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ege/journl/v12y2012i3p285-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of FDI in Terms of “Quantity” and “Quality”: Turkish Case

Author

Listed:
  • Ayca SARIALIOGLU HAYALI

    (Karadeniz Tekcnical University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics)

Abstract

Developing countries offer incentives, such as “financial and tax incentives”, to encourage Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in any case by focusing on the “quantity” of FDI rather than its “quality”. The study maintains that Turkey constitutes a typical developing country in terms of both her relatively liberalized policies aiming at attracting FDI in quantity and her failure about not attracting sufficient FDI compared to the other countries, both developed and developing. On the other hand, the study argues that it is not a typical developing country in terms of attracting “the right quality of FDI”, which is tackled here in terms of “the entry mode of FDI”. The aim of this study is to investigate these arguments through comparisons of FDI inflows to Turkey with the others in terms of both its “quantity” and “quality”. According to this, while the “greenfield investments” as an entry mode of FDI dominates the FDI inflows to developing countries, “brownfield investments” take the dominance in Turkish case. When it is looked at the year base data this finding seems consistent with the mass privatisation era of Turkey started in 2004. The study uses UNCTAD (2010)’s new database on cross-border Merger&Acquisitions (M&As) and obtain greenfield investment data.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayca SARIALIOGLU HAYALI, 2012. "A Comparative Analysis of FDI in Terms of “Quantity” and “Quality”: Turkish Case," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 285-300.
    • Handle: RePEc:ege:journl:v:12:y:2012:i:3:p:285-300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.onlinedergi.com/makaledosyalari/51/pdf2012_3_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.onlinedergi.com/eab/arsiv/arsivDetay.aspx?yil=2012&peryot=2
    File Function: Website of the journal issue
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Narula, Rajneesh & Marin, Anabel, 2003. "FDI spillovers, absorptive capacities and human capital development: evidence from Argentina," Research Memorandum 018, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Xu, Bin, 2000. "Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 477-493, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Cipollina & Giorgia Giovannetti & Filomena Pietrovito & Alberto F. Pozzolo, 2012. "FDI and Growth: What Cross-country Industry Data Say," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(11), pages 1599-1629, November.
    2. Pedro Sánchez-Sellero & Jorge Rosell-Martínez & José Manuel García-Vázquez, 2014. "Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment in Spanish Manufacturing Firms," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 342-351, May.
    3. Ford, Timothy C. & Rork, Jonathan C., 2010. "Why buy what you can get for free? The effect of foreign direct investment on state patent rates," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 72-81, July.
    4. Aurora Teixeira & Li Shu, 2012. "The level of human capital in innovative firms located in China. Is foreign capital relevant?," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 343-360.
    5. J. Rosell-Martinez & P. Sanchez-Sellero, 2011. "Foreign direct investment and technical progress in Spanish manufacturing," Post-Print hal-00693830, HAL.
    6. Joshua Akinlolu Olayinka & Sirinuch Loykulnanta, 2019. "How Domestic Firms Benefit from the Presence of Multinational Enterprises: Evidence from Indonesia and Philippines," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Min Zhao & Qing Chen & Debao Dai & Yaodong Fan & Jiaping Xie, 2024. "The Spillover Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on China’s High-Tech Industry Based on Interprovincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Sultana, Nasrin & Turkina, Ekaterina, 2020. "Foreign direct investment, technological advancement, and absorptive capacity: A network analysis," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    9. Crespo, Nuno & Fontoura, Maria Paula, 2007. "Determinant Factors of FDI Spillovers - What Do We Really Know?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 410-425, March.
    10. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Jan Fagerberg & Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Martin Srholec, 2018. "Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 533-556, July.
    12. Edmond Noubissi & Boker Poumie & Hilaire Nkengfack, 2021. "Effect of environmental policies on exports from sub‐Saharan African countries," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 33(4), pages 688-702, December.
    13. Delgado, Michael S. & McCloud, Nadine & Kumbhakar, Subal C., 2014. "A generalized empirical model of corruption, foreign direct investment, and growth," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 298-316.
    14. Shaukat, Badiea & Zhu, Qigui & Khan, M. Ijaz, 2019. "Real interest rate and economic growth: A statistical exploration for transitory economies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    15. Teixeira, Aurora A.C. & Tavares-Lehmann, Ana Teresa, 2014. "Human capital intensity in technology-based firms located in Portugal: Does foreign ownership matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 737-748.
    16. Grace Li Ann Yong & Kong Weng Ho, 2006. "Innovation, Imitation And Entrepreneurship," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 51(02), pages 147-173.
    17. Camilla Mastromarco & Léopold Simar, 2021. "Latent heterogeneity to evaluate the effect of human capital on world technology frontier," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 71-89, April.
    18. Viengsaythong DALASENG & NIU Xiongying & Khaysy SRITHILAT, 2022. "Cross- Country Investigation of the Impact of Trade Openness and FDI on Economic Growth: A Case of Developing Countries," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 9(1), pages 49-73.
    19. Bisharat Hussain Chang & Khalil Ahmed Channa & Emmanuel Uche & Osamah Ibrahim Khalaf & Osamah Waheed Ali, 2022. "Analyzing the impacts of terrorism on innovation activity: A cross country empirical study," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 26(Special), pages 124-161, December.
    20. Lumengo Bonga-bonga & Maphelane Phume, 2018. "Assessing the relationship between total factor productivity and foreign direct investment in an economy with a skills shortage: the case of South Africa," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(3), pages 1395-1405.
    21. Kimura, Hidemi & Todo, Yasuyuki, 2010. "Is Foreign Aid a Vanguard of Foreign Direct Investment? A Gravity-Equation Approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 482-497, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    FDI; greenfield investment versus brownfield investment; Turkish case;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ege:journl:v:12:y:2012:i:3:p:285-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Baris Gök (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiegetr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.