Author
Listed:
- Burcu ARACIOGLU
(Ege University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Business Administration)
- Fatma DEMIRCAN
(Ege University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Business Administration)
- Harun UCAK
(Ege University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Business Administration)
Abstract
Portfolio optimization, the construction of the best combination of investment instruments that will meet the investors’ basic expectati-ons under certain limitations, has an important place in the finance world. In the portfolio optimization, the Mean Variance model of Markowitz (1952) that expresses a tradeoff between return and risk for a set of portfolios, has played a critical role and affected other studies in this area. In the Mean Variance model, only the covariances between securities are considered in determining the risk of portfolios. The model is based on the assumptions that investors have a quadratic utility function and the return of the securities is distributed normally. Various studies that investigate the validity of these assumptions find evidence against them. Asset returns have significant skewness and kurtosis. In the light of these findings, it is seen that in recent years researchers use higher order of moments in the portfolio selection (Konno et al, 1993; Chunhachinda et al, 1997; Liu et al, 2003; Harvey et al, 2004; Jondeau and Rockinger, 2006; Lai et al, 2006; Jana et al,2007; Maringer and Parpas, 2009; Briec et al, 2007; Taylan and Tatlidil, 2010).In this study, in the mean- variance- skewness- kurtosis framework, multiple conflicting and competing portfolio objectives such as maximizing expected return and skewness and minimizing risk and kurtosis simultaneously, will be addressed by construction of a poly-nomial goal programming (PGP) model. The PGP model will be tested on Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) 30 stocks. Previous empirical results indicate that for all investor preferences and stock indices, the PGP approach is highly effective in order to solve the multi conflicting portfolio goals in the mean – variance - skewness – kurtosis frame-work. In this study, portfolios will be formed in accordance with the investor preferences over incorporation of higher moments. The effects of preferences both on the combination of stocks in the portfolios and descriptive statistics of portfolio returns will be analyzed. Another aim of this study is to investigate the impacts of the incorporation of skewness and kurtosis of asset returns into the portfolio optimization on portfolios’ returns descriptive statistics.
Suggested Citation
Burcu ARACIOGLU & Fatma DEMIRCAN & Harun UCAK, 2011.
"Mean–Variance–Skewness–Kurtosis Approach to Portfolio Optimization: An Application in Istanbul Stock Exchange,"
Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 11(Special I), pages 9-17.
Handle:
RePEc:ege:journl:v:11:y:2011:i:specialissue:p:9-17
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Andries Steenkamp, 2023.
"Convex scalarizations of the mean-variance-skewness-kurtosis problem in portfolio selection,"
Papers
2302.10573, arXiv.org.
- Kanwal Iqbal Khan & Syed M. Waqar Azeem Naqvi & Muhammad Mudassar Ghafoor & Rana Shahid Imdad Akash, 2020.
"Sustainable Portfolio Optimization with Higher-Order Moments of Risk,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
- Daniel ARMEANU & Cristina Andreea DOIA & Melania HANCILA & Sorin CIOACA, 2013.
"The Analysis of the Correlation Intensity Between Emerging Market During Economic Crisis,"
Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 61(2), pages 307-318, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ege:journl:v:11:y:2011:i:specialissue:p:9-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Baris Gök (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiegetr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.