IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v188y2025ics0305750x24003619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What explains the uneven uptake of forest certification at the global level? New evidence from a panel-data analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Bösch, Matthias

Abstract

Currently, more than 10 % of the global forest area is certified. However, uptake of forest management certification has been highly uneven throughout the world, and relatively little is still known about the generic factors that promote or inhibit its adoption. Based on an extensive literature review, a number of hypotheses are developed on the relationship between different demand-side and supply-side variables and the uptake of forest certification. These hypotheses are then tested using econometric estimation methods with data for a large panel of 150 countries from 2002 to 2020, focusing on the two most widespread schemes, the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC). It is found that both FSC and PEFC certification density are positively and significantly correlated with different dimensions of governance, GDP per capita, the share of forest products exports to Europe and the general export orientation of the forest-based sector. Novel to the literature, this study also provides evidence of the important role of environmental NGOs for forest certification, with clear differences between FSC and PEFC certification: while there is a positive and significant correlation between the number of environmental NGOs and FSC certification density, the environmental NGO variable is negatively and significantly associated with PEFC certification density. The paper finishes with discussing a number of important implications of the findings for policy makers tasked with accelerating the implementation of forest certification schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Bösch, Matthias, 2025. "What explains the uneven uptake of forest certification at the global level? New evidence from a panel-data analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:188:y:2025:i:c:s0305750x24003619
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X24003619
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:188:y:2025:i:c:s0305750x24003619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.