IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v127y2020ics0305750x19304772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Have RCTs brought back the “Empirical” into Economics?

Author

Listed:
  • Surendran, Aardra
  • Kumar, Awanish

Abstract

The experimental turn in economics has garnered numerous responses from its supporters and critics alike. One of the under-examined claims made by the Randomistas is that their approach has brought back the empirical into Economics. We counter this position at two levels. At a preliminary level, this is a mis-characterisation of research within economics. At a more fundamental level, the experimental approach represents a confused conception of the relationship between theory and empirics, rendering theory as a purely cognitive activity of which RCTs are the empirical form. Our critique draws from the realist view of social science research in which the empirical and the theoretical are interspersed into each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Surendran, Aardra & Kumar, Awanish, 2020. "Have RCTs brought back the “Empirical” into Economics?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x19304772
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X19304772
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104828?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramachandran, V. K., 1991. "Wage Labour and Unfreedom in Agriculture: An Indian Case Study," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198286479.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Costa, Caio Cesar de Medeiros & Reis, Paulo Ricardo da Costa & Ferreira, Marco Aurelio Marques, 2012. "Impacts And Externalities Of Agricultural Modernization In Brazilian States," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 6(3-4), pages 1-10, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:127:y:2020:i:c:s0305750x19304772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.