IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v82y2019icp26-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of an overweight vehicle permit fee structure for Illinois

Author

Listed:
  • Gungor, Osman Erman
  • Petit, Antoine Michel Alain
  • Qiu, Junjie
  • Zhao, Jingnan
  • Meidani, Hadi
  • Wang, Hao
  • Ouyang, Yanfeng
  • Al-Qadi, Imad L.
  • Mann, Justan

Abstract

Permits are one of the most effective and common tools for state agencies to regulate the operation of overweight and oversize trucks to ensure the safety of passenger and freight traffic and to minimize damage to pavements and bridges. Although the State of Illinois uses a relatively comprehensive permit system, many of its parts have not been revised for more than 30 years. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate up-to-date impacts of overweight (OW) trucks and develop an equitable permit system. In this study, impacts of OW trucks on bridges, pavements, and traffic safety were evaluated; and individual fees were developed for each. The most recent databases on infrastructure condition and state-of-the-art prediction algorithms were employed to produce realistic and up-to-date assessment of OW trucks’ impact. Finally, two approaches were recommended to combine individual fees. The first approach requires developed frameworks for calculating individual fees to be integrated with existing geographic information system-based online permit tools that are currently used by many departments of transportations (DOTs). These tools compute the fee for each vehicle by reporting a route based on user-input origin/destination. The information specific to each OW vehicle (e.g., mile, axle spacing, weight, bridge inventory rating) can be extracted from the reported routes and injected into the developed frameworks. Thereby, the fee can be computed in an equitable and more accurate way. The second approach is converting the frameworks into a formula to conform to the conventional permit fee calculation schemes (e.g., table format).

Suggested Citation

  • Gungor, Osman Erman & Petit, Antoine Michel Alain & Qiu, Junjie & Zhao, Jingnan & Meidani, Hadi & Wang, Hao & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Al-Qadi, Imad L. & Mann, Justan, 2019. "Development of an overweight vehicle permit fee structure for Illinois," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 26-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:26-35
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.08.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X18305596
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.08.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prozzi, J A & Madanat, S M, 2004. "Development of Pavement Performance Models by Combining Experimental and Field Data," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6cf8v5cw, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ciro Caliendo & Maurizio Guida & Emiliana Pepe, 2015. "Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations for Developing a Pavement Performance Model," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(13), pages 199-199, December.
    2. Ali A. Hatoum & Jamal M. Khatib & Firas Barraj & Adel Elkordi, 2022. "Survival Analysis for Asphalt Pavement Performance and Assessment of Various Factors Affecting Fatigue Cracking Based on LTPP Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Anani, Shadi B. & Madanat, Samer M., 2010. "Highway maintenance marginal costs: What if the fourth power assumption is not valid?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 486-495, November.
    4. Dunja Perić & Gyuhyeong Goh & Javad Saeidaskari & Arash Saeidi Rashk Olia & Pooyan Ayar, 2022. "Development of Prediction Models for Performance of Flexible Pavements in Kansas with Emphasis on the Effects of Subgrade and Unbound Layers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Chu, Chih-Yuan & Durango-Cohen, Pablo L., 2008. "Estimation of dynamic performance models for transportation infrastructure using panel data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 57-81, January.
    6. Neil Murray & Heike Link, 2020. "A Duration Approach for Estimating the Marginal Renewal Cost at German Motorways," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1898, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Saad Issa Sarsam, 2019. "Assessment of the Deterioration Model for Asphalt Concrete Pavement," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(7), pages 71-80, July.
    8. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Model Uncertainty and the Management of a System of Infrastructure Facilities," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6c84b9b4, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. David Llopis-Castelló & Tatiana García-Segura & Laura Montalbán-Domingo & Amalia Sanz-Benlloch & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Influence of Pavement Structure, Traffic, and Weather on Urban Flexible Pavement Deterioration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Mehmet Fettahoglu & Sheikh Shahriar Ahmed & Irina Benedyk & Panagiotis Ch. Anastasopoulos, 2024. "Macroscopic State-Level Analysis of Pavement Roughness Using Time–Space Econometric Modeling Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Kuhn, Kenneth D. & Madanat, Samer M., 2005. "Robust Maintenance Policies for Markovian Systems under Model Uncertainty," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1d85j6mt, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Lu, Pan & Tolliver, Denver, 2012. "Pavement Pre- and Post-Treatment Performance Models Using LTPP Data," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 51(3).
    13. Nakat, Z. & Madanat, S. & Farshidi, F. & Harvey, J., 2006. "Development of an Empirical-Mechanistic Model of Overlay Crack Progression using Data from the Washington State PMS Database," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0488k9kz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:82:y:2019:i:c:p:26-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.