IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v3y1996i3p123-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on fares in regulated and deregulated airline markets : A comparison of Spain and the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Betancor, O
  • Jorge-Calderón, J. D.

Abstract

This note reports on a comparison of fares policy in international scheduled airline passenger services between deregulated markets in the UK and regulated markets in Spain, for the period extending from 1986 to 1991. The comparison looks at the range of fare types available; the extent to which fare types are made available across routes; and the discount rate for selected fare types. The methodology used to compare fare levels controls for exogenous factors such as differing distances and traffic densities. The study concludes that whereas the discounts offered for particular fare types need not be greater in deregulated markets, these markets display a wider range of available discounts. The likely resulting effect is that yields (revenue per passenger) are lower in deregulated markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Betancor, O & Jorge-Calderón, J. D., 1996. "A note on fares in regulated and deregulated airline markets : A comparison of Spain and the UK," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 123-125, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:3:y:1996:i:3:p:123-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0967-070X(96)00014-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:3:y:1996:i:3:p:123-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.