Author
Listed:
- Ehsani, Johnathon P.
- Michael, Jeffrey P.
- Frattaroli, Shannon
- Pollack Porter, Keshia M.
- Yenokyan, Gayane
- Sabit, Ahmed
Abstract
Conventional road safety strategies are yielding diminishing returns. The Safe System approach is based on the premise that human errors will occur on the roadway and that the system should be designed to accommodate these errors, so they do not result in death or serious injury. Elements of the system include the roadway infrastructure, vehicle engineering, and speed management.Political support for U.S. Safe System implementation gained momentum with $5 billion in appropriated funds in the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The purpose of this study was to measure public support for Safe System implementation. We fielded a nationally representative survey of US adults from May 4 to June 10, 2022 (N = 2274). We measured whether respondents considered individual- or systems-oriented approaches as the most effective way to prevent traffic deaths. We also assessed support for various roadway interventions and vehicle safety technologies. Most respondents agreed that system-level changes were the most effective way to prevent traffic deaths. Endorsement for system-level changes was significantly higher among younger age groups. Support for roadway improvements and vehicle safety technologies varied according to the type of intervention that was proposed. Public support for a Safe System approach is high, particularly among younger adults, which suggests that the momentum for the movement can be sustained over the long term.
Suggested Citation
Ehsani, Johnathon P. & Michael, Jeffrey P. & Frattaroli, Shannon & Pollack Porter, Keshia M. & Yenokyan, Gayane & Sabit, Ahmed, 2024.
"Public support for a safe system approach to reducing motor vehicle crash deaths in the United States,"
Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 405-407.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:trapol:v:159:y:2024:i:c:p:405-407
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.10.031
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:159:y:2024:i:c:p:405-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.