IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v44y2008i3p504-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative vs. non-collaborative container-vessel scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Lei, Lei
  • Fan, Chunxing
  • Boile, Maria
  • Theofanis, Sotiris

Abstract

In this study, we mathematically model and empirically investigate the operational performance of container-vessel schedules under three management policies: the non-collaborative policy, the slot-sharing policy, and the total-sharing (the total collaboration) policy. A hypothesized shipping process based upon the practice of a real-life container shipping company is used in the experiments. Empirical results observed under different problem settings and from 2040 randomly generated test cases are reported. The study reveals that without partner carriers' full commitment to share the demand and the resources in a flexible manner, the advantage of collaborative planning cannot be fully exploited.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei, Lei & Fan, Chunxing & Boile, Maria & Theofanis, Sotiris, 2008. "Collaborative vs. non-collaborative container-vessel scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 504-520, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:44:y:2008:i:3:p:504-520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554507000129
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dung-Ying Lin & Chien-Chih Huang & ManWo Ng, 2017. "The coopetition game in international liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 474-495, May.
    2. Tan, Zhijia & Meng, Qiang & Wang, Fan & Kuang, Hai-bo, 2018. "Strategic integration of the inland port and shipping service for the ocean carrier," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 90-109.
    3. Christiansen, Marielle & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Nygreen, Bjørn & Ronen, David, 2013. "Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 467-483.
    4. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    5. Panayides, Photis M. & Wiedmer, Robert, 2011. "Strategic alliances in container liner shipping," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 25-38.
    6. Zheng, Shiyuan & Ge, Ying-En & Fu, Xiaowen & (Marco) Nie, Yu & Xie, Chi, 2020. "Demand information sharing in port concession arrangements," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 118-143.
    7. Liu, Jiaguo & Wang, Junjin, 2019. "Carrier alliance incentive analysis and coordination in a maritime transport chain based on service competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 333-355.
    8. Xing, Xinjie & Song, Dongping & Qiu, Chengfeng & Drake, Paul R. & Zhan, Yuanzhu, 2023. "Joint tank container demurrage policy and flow optimisation using a progressive hedging algorithm with expanded time-space network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 663-679.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:44:y:2008:i:3:p:504-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.