IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v42y2006i1p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The net benefit of airline overbooking

Author

Listed:
  • Suzuki, Yoshinori

Abstract

Benefits of airline overbooking are often measured by considering only the revenue gains attained for overbooked (congested) flights, and ignoring the potential loss of revenues that may take place in other (un-congested) flights (i.e., the "gross" benefit). This study explores the "net" benefit of overbooking by considering revenue implications of overbooking on both congested and un-congested flights. A series of simulation experiments are conducted to investigate the nature of the relationship between the gross and net benefits. The results imply that the net benefit may be substantially lower than the gross benefit under many practical conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzuki, Yoshinori, 2006. "The net benefit of airline overbooking," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:42:y:2006:i:1:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554504000845
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dalalah, Doraid & Ojiako, Udechukwu & Chipulu, Maxwell, 2020. "Voluntary overbooking in commercial airline reservations," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Ma, Jie & Tse, Ying Kei & Wang, Xiaojun & Zhang, Minhao, 2019. "Examining customer perception and behaviour through social media research – An empirical study of the United Airlines overbooking crisis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 192-205.
    3. Wang, Xiaojia & Fung, Richard Y.K., 2014. "An option-based hedging mechanism for managing the risk of overbooking in parallel airline alliances," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 146-162.
    4. Chen, Lijian, 2020. "Determine the cost of denying boarding to passengers: An optimization-based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. Fukui, Hideki & Nagata, Koki, 2020. "How do passengers react to airlines’ overbooking strategies? Evidence from the US airlines," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 242-255.
    6. Naragain Phumchusri & Phatsakorn Sangsukiam & Nannapat Chariyasethapong, 2020. "Optimal overbooking model for car rental business with two levels of prices having stochastic joint booking and show-up levels," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 190-209, June.
    7. Bharill, Rohit & Rangaraj, Narayan, 2008. "Revenue management in railway operations: A study of the Rajdhani Express, Indian Railways," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1195-1207, November.
    8. Costantino, Francesco & Di Gravio, Giulio & Tronci, Massimo, 2013. "Return on quality: Simulating customer retention in a flight firming project," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 20-24.
    9. Alavi Fard, Farzad & Sy, Malick & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2019. "Optimal overbooking strategies in the airlines using dynamic programming approach in continuous time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 384-399.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:42:y:2006:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.