IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v35y1999i1p25-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing strategies for addressing delivery shortages in stochastic demand settings

Author

Listed:
  • Haughton, Michael A.
  • Stenger, Alan J.

Abstract

In logistics networks involving one supply point (depot) and several geographically dispersed demand points (e.g., retail stores), delivery shortages will result if the design of delivery routes ignores random period-to-period fluctuations in customer demands. Delivery shortages may be costly enough for the depot to seek strategies to prevent them. A requirement for rational comparison of strategies is quantifying their effects on total supply chain costs. Accurate distance prediction models are developed to help satisfy this prerequisite for the transportation cost element. These models are integrated into a comparison of strategies on the basis of how these strategies affect inventory and transportation. The focus of findings from the comparison involves identifying the information cost thresholds for accepting/rejecting a demand-responsive strategy. The study's implications for choosing a strategy are presented. ©

Suggested Citation

  • Haughton, Michael A. & Stenger, Alan J., 1999. "Comparing strategies for addressing delivery shortages in stochastic demand settings," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 25-41, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:35:y:1999:i:1:p:25-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554598000210
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:35:y:1999:i:1:p:25-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.