IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v33y1997i1p67-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carrier selection: Do shippers and carriers agree, or not?

Author

Listed:
  • Murphy, Paul R.
  • Daley, James M.
  • Hall, Patricia K.

Abstract

Previous carrier selection studies involving both shipper and carrier perspectives have discovered numerous differences between shippers and carriers, at least in terms of mean score comparisons. However, analysis of the relative importance of the selection factors (not reported in previous studies) uniformly shows a high degree of similarity between shippers and carriers. A new shipper-carrier study, investigating a more specific selection (of truckload general freight carriers), discovered a similar dichotomy between the mean score and relative comparisons. The paper concludes by developing several research propositions and by offering suggestions for additional research.

Suggested Citation

  • Murphy, Paul R. & Daley, James M. & Hall, Patricia K., 1997. "Carrier selection: Do shippers and carriers agree, or not?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 67-72, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:33:y:1997:i:1:p:67-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554596000038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reis, Vasco, 2014. "Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-120.
    2. Ribbink, D. & van Riel, A.C.R. & Semeijn, J., 2004. "Transportation policy and the effects on modal choice in the EU," Research Memorandum 010, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    3. Flitsch, Verena & Brümmerstedt, Katrin, 2015. "Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 233-266, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    4. Morales-Fusco, Pau & Saurí, Sergi & Lago, Alejandro, 2012. "Potential freight distribution improvements using motorways of the sea," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Bury Alan & Paraskevadakis Dimitrios & Ren Jun & Saeed Farhan, 2017. "A framework for use in modelling the modal choice decision making process in North West England’s Atlantic Gateway," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 19-30, May.
    6. Petr Jirsák & Petr Kolář, 2012. "Customer Orientation and Marketing in Containerized Freight Distribution and Logistics - Perspectives of the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(3), pages 46-50.
    7. Wen, Xin & Ma, Hoi-Lam & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative on the China-Europe trading route selections," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 581-604.
    8. Yang, Ching-Chiao & Marlow, Peter B. & Lu, Chin-Shan, 2009. "Assessing resources, logistics service capabilities, innovation capabilities and the performance of container shipping services in Taiwan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 4-20, November.
    9. Lagoudis, Ioannis N. & Theotokas, Ioannis, 2007. "Chapter 4 The Competitive Advantage in the Greek Shipping Industry," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 95-120, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:33:y:1997:i:1:p:67-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.