IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v194y2025ics1366554524004800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patent licensing strategies in supply chains with downstream coopetition

Author

Listed:
  • Qi, Hongmei
  • Shi, Jihang
  • Zhang, Xuefeng

Abstract

This study investigates a supply chain comprising a technology patent holder, a national brand, and an outsourcing manufacturer. Through the development of an analytical model, we explore the effects of downstream co-opetition on the patent holder’s licensing strategies and clarify the interactive dynamics between the involved parties. The key findings are as follows: (1) Enhancing consumer’s perceived value of products produced by the outsourcing manufacturer does not always lead to positive outcomes. (2) Expanding patent licensing to additional firms may not always be advantageous for the patent holder and, in certain cases, may even reduce its profitability. (3) Under specific conditions, there is an interaction between the patent holder’s licensing strategy and the national brand’s outsourcing decisions. Notably, when the national brand assumes a leadership role in decision-making, this interaction becomes more pronounced. (4) The existence of a feasible decision-making region enables not only a “win–win” outcome for decision makers but also a “win–win–win” scenario benefiting all participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi, Hongmei & Shi, Jihang & Zhang, Xuefeng, 2025. "Patent licensing strategies in supply chains with downstream coopetition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:194:y:2025:i:c:s1366554524004800
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524004800
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:194:y:2025:i:c:s1366554524004800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.