IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v41y2007i2p179-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Railway timetable stability analysis using max-plus system theory

Author

Listed:
  • Goverde, Rob M.P.

Abstract

In highly-interconnected timetables or dense railway traffic, a single delayed train may cause a domino effect of secondary delays over the entire network, which is a main concern to planners and dispatchers. This paper describes a stability theory to analyse timetables on sensitivity and robustness to delays based on a linear system description of a railway timetable in max-plus algebra. The max-plus model includes train interdependencies resulting from the timetable, logistics, and the shared infrastructure. Stability is the self-regulatory behaviour of the railway system to return to the steady state of the railway timetable after disruptions. The proposed approach evaluates timetable realizability and stability using max-plus spectral analysis and quantifies robustness using critical path algorithms. Moreover, delay propagation of initial delay scenarios over time and space is effectively computed by explicit recursive equations taking into account zero-order dynamics. The max-plus approach enables a real-time analysis of large-scale periodic railway timetables. A case-study of the Dutch national railway timetable illustrates the potential of the developed methodology to support the design of reliable railway timetables in dense railway traffic networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Goverde, Rob M.P., 2007. "Railway timetable stability analysis using max-plus system theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 179-201, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:41:y:2007:i:2:p:179-201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(06)00020-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:41:y:2007:i:2:p:179-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.