IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v32y1998i5p343-360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solution to the user equilibrium dynamic traffic routing problem using feedback linearization

Author

Listed:
  • Kachroo, Pushkin
  • Özbay, Kaan

Abstract

In this paper, the Dynamic Traffic Routing problem is defined as the real-time point diversion of traffic during non-recurrent congestion. This dynamic traffic routing problem is then formulated as a feedback control problem that determines the time-dependent split parameters at the diversion point for routing the incoming traffic flow onto the alternate routes in order to achieve a user-equilibrium traffic pattern. Feedback linearization technique is used to solve this specific user-equilibrium formulation of the Dynamic Traffic Routing problem. The control input is the traffic split factor at the diversion point. By transforming the dynamics of the system into canonical form, a control law is obtained which cancels the nonlinearities of the system. Simulation results show that the performance of this controller on a test network is quite promising.

Suggested Citation

  • Kachroo, Pushkin & Özbay, Kaan, 1998. "Solution to the user equilibrium dynamic traffic routing problem using feedback linearization," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 343-360, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:32:y:1998:i:5:p:343-360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(97)00031-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Ran & David E. Boyce & Larry J. LeBlanc, 1993. "A New Class of Instantaneous Dynamic User-Optimal Traffic Assignment Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 192-202, February.
    2. Terry L. Friesz & Javier Luque & Roger L. Tobin & Byung-Wook Wie, 1989. "Dynamic Network Traffic Assignment Considered as a Continuous Time Optimal Control Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 893-901, December.
    3. Papageorgiou, Markos, 1990. "Dynamic modeling, assignment, and route guidance in traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 471-495, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kotsialos, Apostolos & Papageorgiou, Markos, 2004. "Motorway network traffic control systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(2), pages 321-333, January.
    2. Pi, Xidong & Qian, Zhen (Sean), 2017. "A stochastic optimal control approach for real-time traffic routing considering demand uncertainties and travelers’ choice heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 710-732.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2006. "A composite traffic flow modeling approach for incident-responsive network traffic assignment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 461-478.
    2. Lam, William H. K. & Huang, Hai-Jun, 1995. "Dynamic user optimal traffic assignment model for many to one travel demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 243-259, August.
    3. Tong, C. O. & Wong, S. C., 2000. "A predictive dynamic traffic assignment model in congested capacity-constrained road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 625-644, November.
    4. Bellei, Giuseppe & Gentile, Guido & Papola, Natale, 2005. "A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Jiancheng Long & Hai-Jun Huang & Ziyou Gao & W. Y. Szeto, 2013. "An Intersection-Movement-Based Dynamic User Optimal Route Choice Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1134-1147, October.
    6. Friesz, Terry L. & Han, Ke & Neto, Pedro A. & Meimand, Amir & Yao, Tao, 2013. "Dynamic user equilibrium based on a hydrodynamic model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 102-126.
    7. Ozbay, Kaan & Bartin, Bekir, 2004. "Estimation Of Economic Impact Of Vms Route Guidance Using Microsimulation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 215-241, January.
    8. Y. Ge & B. Sun & H. Zhang & W. Szeto & Xizhao Zhou, 2015. "A Comparison of Dynamic User Optimal States with Zero, Fixed and Variable Tolerances," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 583-598, September.
    9. Guo, Qiangqiang & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff), 2020. "Macroscopic fundamental diagram based perimeter control considering dynamic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 87-109.
    10. N. Nezamuddin & Stephen Boyles, 2015. "A Continuous DUE Algorithm Using the Link Transmission Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 465-483, September.
    11. Han, Sangjin, 2007. "A route-based solution algorithm for dynamic user equilibrium assignments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1094-1113, December.
    12. Han, Lanshan & Ukkusuri, Satish & Doan, Kien, 2011. "Complementarity formulations for the cell transmission model based dynamic user equilibrium with departure time choice, elastic demand and user heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1749-1767.
    13. Friesz, Terry L. & Kim, Taeil & Kwon, Changhyun & Rigdon, Matthew A., 2011. "Approximate network loading and dual-time-scale dynamic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 176-207, January.
    14. Long, Jiancheng & Szeto, W.Y. & Huang, Hai-Jun & Gao, Ziyou, 2015. "An intersection-movement-based stochastic dynamic user optimal route choice model for assessing network performance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 182-217.
    15. Ukkusuri, Satish V. & Han, Lanshan & Doan, Kien, 2012. "Dynamic user equilibrium with a path based cell transmission model for general traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1657-1684.
    16. Chai, Huajun, 2019. "Dynamic Traffic Routing and Adaptive Signal Control in a Connected Vehicles Environment," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9ng3z8vn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. Moore, II, James E. & Kim, Geunyoung & Cho, Seongdil & Hu, Hsi-hwa & Xu, Rong, 1997. "Evaluating System ATMIS Technologies Via Rapid Estimation Of Network Flows: Final Report," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5c70f3d9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    18. Zhao, Chunxue & Fu, Baibai & Wang, Tianming, 2014. "Braess paradox and robustness of traffic networks under stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 135-141.
    19. Y. W. Xu & J. H. Wu & M. Florian & P. Marcotte & D. L. Zhu, 1999. "Advances in the Continuous Dynamic Network Loading Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 341-353, November.
    20. Long, Jiancheng & Szeto, W.Y. & Du, Jie & Wong, R.C.P., 2017. "A dynamic taxi traffic assignment model: A two-level continuum transportation system approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 222-254.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:32:y:1998:i:5:p:343-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.