IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v27y1993i1p65-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of binary choice frequencies with limit cases: Comparison of alternative estimation methods and application to weekly household mode choice

Author

Listed:
  • Goulias, Konstadinos G.
  • Kitamura, Ryuichi

Abstract

An extensive evaluation of alternative estimation methods for logistic binary choice probabilities when applied to binary frequency data with limit cases is presented in this paper. The methods examined are binomial-logistic (BL) model, Berkson's (BK) method, and Haldane's (HL) method. These models are applied to weekly mode choice data that contained a substantial number of limit cases in which one of the alternatives was never chosen. The results indicate that the BL model is a practical tool that outperforms all the other methods examined in this study. The BL models accommodate limit cases without requiring any additional assumptions or approximations. The BK and HL methods have been shown to offer coefficient estimates similar to, and fits that are somewhat worse than, those obtained by the BL models. These methods remain to be useful tools for the analysis of binary frequency data, especially in initial phases of analysis. In this paper it is also shown that coefficient estimates of HL methods are sensitive to the value of the adjustment constant, [Delta], used to incorporate limit cases, and its optimal value may depend on the data at hand.

Suggested Citation

  • Goulias, Konstadinos G. & Kitamura, Ryuichi, 1993. "Analysis of binary choice frequencies with limit cases: Comparison of alternative estimation methods and application to weekly household mode choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 65-78, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:27:y:1993:i:1:p:65-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(93)90012-Y
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:27:y:1993:i:1:p:65-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.