IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v23y1989i1p75-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new approach to modal split analysis: Some empirical results

Author

Listed:
  • Reggiani, A.
  • Stefani, S.

Abstract

This paper describes a new approach (SD-MNL) to analyze modal choice. The SD-MNL method allows one to consider travelling modes under uncertainty. In particular, different states of nature for the alternatives are taken into account. In this scenario, Stochastic Dominance rules (SD) will be applied together with Multinomial Logit models (MNL) to describe a flow pattern in Regione Lombardia, Italy. The results obtained fit statistically the observed data and give rise to interesting considerations about travelling modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Reggiani, A. & Stefani, S., 1989. "A new approach to modal split analysis: Some empirical results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 75-82, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:23:y:1989:i:1:p:75-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(89)90025-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nijkamp, P. & Reggiani, A., 1992. "Static and dynamic spatial interaction models : an integrating perspective," Serie Research Memoranda 0052, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:23:y:1989:i:1:p:75-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.