IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v22y1988i3p173-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of in-vehicle and out-of- vehicle freight consolidation strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Daganzo, Carlos F.

Abstract

This paper addresses physical distribution problems, in which items have to be distributed from an origin to many destinations, and it examines ways to reduce inventories. Under certain conditions, a peddling strategy with no transshipments is shown to be superior to any strategy with transshipments. Although the conditions leading to this result are not always met, the results suggest that transshipments are undersirable for freight distribution, unless of course they serve a purpose unrelated to inventory. This is contrast with many-to-many shipping operations which, under the same conditions, can benefit greatly from transshipments.

Suggested Citation

  • Daganzo, Carlos F., 1988. "A comparison of in-vehicle and out-of- vehicle freight consolidation strategies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 173-180, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:22:y:1988:i:3:p:173-180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(88)90013-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luca Bertazzi & Maria Grazia Speranza & Walter Ukovich, 2000. "Exact and Heuristic Solutions for a Shipment Problem with Given Frequencies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(7), pages 973-988, July.
    2. Estrada-Romeu, Miquel & Robusté, Francesc, 2015. "Stopover and hub-and-spoke shipment strategies in less-than-truckload carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 108-121.
    3. Ansari, Sina & Başdere, Mehmet & Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Smilowitz, Karen, 2018. "Advancements in continuous approximation models for logistics and transportation systems: 1996–2016," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 229-252.
    4. Zhang, Wentao & Uhan, Nelson A. & Dessouky, Maged & Toriello, Alejandro, 2018. "Moulin mechanism design for freight consolidation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 141-162.
    5. Tang, Shao-Long & Yan, Hong, 2010. "Pre-distribution vs. post-distribution for cross-docking with transshipments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 192-202, June.
    6. Anton J. Kleywegt & Jason D. Papastavrou, 1998. "Acceptance and Dispatching Policies for a Distribution Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 127-141, May.
    7. Bertazzi, Luca & Speranza, Maria Grazia & Ukovich, Walter, 1997. "Minimization of logistic costs with given frequencies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 327-340, August.
    8. Estrada, Miquel & Roca-Riu, Mireia, 2017. "Stakeholder’s profitability of carrier-led consolidation strategies in urban goods distribution," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 165-188.
    9. Anna Franceschetti & Ola Jabali & Gilbert Laporte, 2017. "Continuous approximation models in freight distribution management," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(3), pages 413-433, October.
    10. Baita, Flavio & Ukovich, Walter & Pesenti, Raffaele & Favaretto, Daniela, 1998. "Dynamic routing-and-inventory problems: a review," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 585-598, November.
    11. Turkensteen, Marcel & Klose, Andreas, 2012. "Demand dispersion and logistics costs in one-to-many distribution systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 499-507.
    12. Langevin, André & Mbaraga, Pontien & Campbell, James F., 1996. "Continuous approximation models in freight distribution: An overview," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 163-188, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:22:y:1988:i:3:p:173-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.