IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v27y1993i2p139-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ridership and cost on the Long Beach-Los Angeles Blue Line Train

Author

Listed:
  • Moore, James E.

Abstract

The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 places a new policy emphasis on rail transit. Los Angeles county is in the process of building a 300-mile, $78.2 billion rail transit system. The first component of the system, the Long Beach-Los Angeles Blue Line light rail trail, has been in operation since July 15, 1990. Official ridership forecasts for the Blue Line are 35,000 boardings per weekday in 1991, and 54,700 boardings per weekday in the year 2000. Ridership counts by researchers at the University of Southern California provide estimates of 24,100 boardings on June 3, 1991, and an average of 26,557 daily boardings during Fall 1991. These figures imply that the total cost per Blue Line boarding is substantially higher than the average for light and heavy rail systems recently examined by the U.S. Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transit Administration. It is unlikely that Blue Line ridership will increase, because the most reliable predictors of rail transit ridership are not under policy control. If bus boardings are accounted for, the net result of the Los Angeles rail initiative has been a reduction in transit ridership.

Suggested Citation

  • Moore, James E., 1993. "Ridership and cost on the Long Beach-Los Angeles Blue Line Train," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 139-152, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:27:y:1993:i:2:p:139-152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0965-8564(93)90069-W
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia & Banerjee, Tridib, 1994. "Form Follows Transit? The Blue Line Corridor's Development Potentials," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt68t5q6b3, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Wachs, Martin, 1993. "Learning from Los Angeles: Transport, Urban Form, and Air Quality," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2wv0h7rq, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Jianling Li & Martin Wachs, 2004. "The effects of federal transit subsidy policy on investment decisions: The case of San Francisco's Geary Corridor," Transportation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 43-67, February.
    4. Werner, Carol M. & Brown, Barbara B. & Tribby, Calvin P. & Tharp, Doug & Flick, Kristi & Miller, Harvey J. & Smith, Ken R. & Jensen, Wyatt, 2016. "Evaluating the attractiveness of a new light rail extension: Testing simple change and displacement change hypotheses," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 15-23.
    5. Prud'homme, Rémy & Koning, Martin & Kopp, Pierre, 2011. "Substituting a tramway to a bus line in Paris: Costs and benefits," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 563-572, August.
    6. Jeongwoo Lee & Marlon Boarnet & Douglas Houston & Hilary Nixon & Steven Spears, 2017. "Changes in Service and Associated Ridership Impacts near a New Light Rail Transit Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-27, October.
    7. Li, Jianling & Wachs, Martin, 2003. "The Effects of Federal Transit Subsidy Policy on Investment Decisions: The Case of San Francisco's Geary Corridor," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5x2863g2, University of California Transportation Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:27:y:1993:i:2:p:139-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.