IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v193y2025ics0965856425000175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing parking for fairness — A simulation study based on an empirically calibrated model of parking behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Kappenberger, Jakob
  • Stuckenschmidt, Heiner
  • Gerdon, Frederic

Abstract

It has been widely recognized that public parking, if not managed correctly, can significantly decrease a city’s quality of life due to increased traffic and its impact on mobility and the environment. To avoid these negative effects, various parking policies have been proposed to reduce traffic while guaranteeing high accessibility, especially in city centers. This work investigates different pricing policies for public parking, including dynamic pricing and Machine Learning-based strategies that can directly optimize policy goals, such as improving mobility or accessibility. In doing so, we pay special attention to an aspect often ignored when implementing pricing policies for public parking: fairness with regard to equal outcomes for different social groups. Since the effects of pricing policies are very sensitive to financial inequality, we specifically investigate the impact of policies on different income groups. As a foundation for these experiments, we introduce a parking simulation featuring an empirically calibrated behavioral model of parking. We find that (1) dynamic pricing schemes may negatively impact fairness; (2) fair pricing for parking may require different fees for individual social groups; (3) focusing on single policy goals when devising pricing for parking results in unintended consequences; (4) Machine Learning shows potential for creating pricing strategies combining different policy goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Kappenberger, Jakob & Stuckenschmidt, Heiner & Gerdon, Frederic, 2025. "Pricing parking for fairness — A simulation study based on an empirically calibrated model of parking behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:193:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000175
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000175
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:193:y:2025:i:c:s0965856425000175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.