IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v174y2023ics0965856423001684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work flexibly, travel more healthily? How telework and flextime affect active travel in Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Wöhner, Fabienne

Abstract

The impact of flexible working arrangements, such as telework and flextime, on daily travel demand is widely discussed. Although there is no evidence that flexible working arrangements reduce traffic in Switzerland, they still might be beneficial for the environment and public health if they are associated with more active travel (i.e. walking and cycling). Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate the influence of telework and flextime on various active travel patterns as well as possible benefits for public health. Most studies agree on a positive association between telework and active travel. However, these studies mostly rely on spatial flexibility (i.e. working remotely), and do not consider temporal flexibility (i.e. flextime). This study is the first to include different extents of working schedule flexibility in order to analyze active travel behavior. Active mode choices and travel durations are analyzed using the 2015 Swiss Mobility and Transport Microcensus (MTMC) – a nationwide representative micro-data travel survey. The results of this study indicate that telework is not associated with the likelihood of using active modes of transport overall; however, teleworkers walk and cycle more for leisure purposes as compared to on-site workers. Furthermore, the analyses show that flextime (particularly core time) users are more likely to use active modes of transport as compared to people who have a predetermined working schedule, which is mainly attributed to the fact that flextime users walk more. In order to indicate some health benefits, flexible working arrangements are analyzed concerning traveling actively for 30 minutes or more per day. This threshold refers to the recommendation of the World Health Organization concerning health-enhancing amounts of physical activity. The analyses reveal that telework and flextime (core time) are significantly associated with a health-enhancing amount of active travel. Another important finding of this study is that the Body Mass Index (BMI) and the weather condition should be included as control variables in studies that aim to analyze the direct effect of flexible working arrangements on active travel behavior. Overall, this study shows the importance of both spatial and temporal flexibility for choosing active modes of transport. The latter finding in particular is important for future research and policy decisions, as until now the impact of telework on active travel has been the main consideration, without recognizing flextime.

Suggested Citation

  • Wöhner, Fabienne, 2023. "Work flexibly, travel more healthily? How telework and flextime affect active travel in Switzerland," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:174:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423001684
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856423001684
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duco Vos & Evert Meijers & Maarten Ham, 2018. "Working from home and the willingness to accept a longer commute," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(2), pages 375-398, September.
    2. Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 1991. "Telecommuting and Travel: State of the Practice, State of the Art," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4zc486ph, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Ozbilen, Basar & Wang, Kailai & Akar, Gulsah, 2021. "Revisiting the impacts of virtual mobility on travel behavior: An exploration of daily travel time expenditures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 49-62.
    4. Pucher, J. & Buehler, R. & Bassett, D.R. & Dannenberg, A.L., 2010. "Walking and cycling to health: A comparative analysis of city, state, and international data," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(10), pages 1986-1992.
    5. Caldarola, Bernardo & Sorrell, Steve, 2022. "Do teleworkers travel less? Evidence from the English National Travel Survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 282-303.
    6. Sulikova, Simona & Brand, Christian, 2022. "Do information-based measures affect active travel, and if so, for whom, when and under what circumstances? Evidence from a longitudinal case-control study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 219-234.
    7. de Abreu e Silva, João & Melo, Patrícia C., 2018. "Does home-based telework reduce household total travel? A path analysis using single and two worker British households," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 148-162.
    8. Sener, Ipek N. & Reeder, Phillip R., 2014. "An integrated analysis of workers’ physically active activity and active travel choice behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 381-393.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wöhner, Fabienne, 2022. "Work flexibly, travel less? The impact of telework and flextime on mobility behavior in Switzerland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Rodrigo Victoriano-Habit & Ahmed El-Geneidy, 2024. "Studying the Interrelationship between Telecommuting during COVID-19, residential local accessibility, and active travel: a panel study in Montréal, Canada," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1149-1166, June.
    3. Elldér, Erik, 2020. "Telework and daily travel: New evidence from Sweden," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Beck, Matthew J. & Hensher, David A., 2022. "Australia 6 months after COVID-19 restrictions part 2: The impact of working from home," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 274-285.
    5. Caldarola, Bernardo & Sorrell, Steve, 2022. "Do teleworkers travel less? Evidence from the English National Travel Survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 282-303.
    6. Ghinami, Francesca, 2023. "Effects of remote work on population distribution across cities: US evidence from a QSE model," SocArXiv krnzq, Center for Open Science.
    7. Kogus, Ayelet & Brůhová Foltýnová, Hana & Gal-Tzur, Ayelet & Shiftan, Yuval & Vejchodská, Eliška & Shiftan, Yoram, 2022. "Will COVID-19 accelerate telecommuting? A cross-country evaluation for Israel and Czechia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 291-309.
    8. Lee, Richard J. & Sener, Ipek N., 2016. "Transportation planning and quality of life: Where do they intersect?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 146-155.
    9. Andrew Hook & Victor Court & Benjamin K Sovacool & Steven Sorrell, 2020. "A Systematic Review of the Energy and Climate Impacts of Teleworking," Working Papers hal-03192905, HAL.
    10. Budnitz, Hannah & Tranos, Emmanouil & Chapman, Lee, 2020. "Telecommuting and other trips: an English case study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Reimann, Felix, 2021. "On employer-paid parking and parking (cash-out) policy: A formal synthesis of different perspectives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 499-516.
    12. Michel Noussan & Matteo Jarre, 2021. "Assessing Commuting Energy and Emissions Savings through Remote Working and Carpooling: Lessons from an Italian Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Qikang Zhong & Bo Li & Tian Dong, 2024. "Building sustainable slow communities: the impact of built environments on leisure-time physical activities in Shanghai," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Shafizadeh, K. & Niemeier, D. & Mokhtarian, P. & Salomon, I., 1998. "The Costs And Benefits Of Telecommuting: An Evaluation Of Macro-scale Literature," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1f01c191, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    15. Dwi Prasetyanto & Muhamad Rizki & Yos Sunitiyoso, 2022. "Online Learning Participation Intention after COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Do Students Still Make Trips for Online Class?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Kroesen, Maarten & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Understanding how accessibility influences health via active travel: Results from a structural equation model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Veronika Kalouguina & Joël Wagner, 2020. "How Do Health, Care Services Consumption and Lifestyle Factors Affect the Choice of Health Insurance Plans in Switzerland?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Nicholas A. Mailloux & Colleen P. Henegan & Dorothy Lsoto & Kristen P. Patterson & Paul C. West & Jonathan A. Foley & Jonathan A. Patz, 2021. "Climate Solutions Double as Health Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Yang, Yongjiang & Sasaki, Kuniaki & Cheng, Long & Tao, Sui, 2022. "Does the built environment matter for active travel among older adults: Insights from Chiba City, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    20. Salomon, Ilan & Cohen, Galit & Nijkamp, Peter, 1999. "ICT and urban public policy : does knowledge meet policy?," Serie Research Memoranda 0047, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:174:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423001684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.