IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v142y2020icp115-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monte-Carlo optimization model for dynamic capital structure adjustment in Chinese public-private partnerships under revenue uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Huimin
  • Song, Shuang
  • Hu, Yi
  • Yan, Xue

Abstract

In the case of revenue uncertainty, the static capital structure predefined in the feasibility stage of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) cannot satisfy the need of dynamic adjustment in the capital structure of Chinese PPPs during project operation, thus deteriorating project financial viability in the long run. Therefore, this paper aims to propose a Monte-Carlo optimization model that can enhance the requirement of the dynamic capital structure of PPPs in the uncertain environment regarding the Chinese bridge sector. By quantifying the adjustment cost derived from changes in equity and debt, the proposed model can make a comparison analysis of dynamic capital structures of a specific project in different scenarios with three capital structure adjustment strategies adopted, respectively. In particular, the before-and-after effects and effectiveness derived from the use of government subsidies, capital market financing, and debt financing in adjusting capital structures of a PPP project, respectively, can be compared and evaluated. Based on historic data of the Hangzhou Bay Bridge (HBB) case, the imbalanced roles of the three strategies are unveiled that the strategy of government subsidies has a stronger effect as compared with the other two strategies, thereby enhancing project financial viability and sustainability. The simulation results of the HBB case further indicate that the debt financing strategy, which is the actual strategy applied to HBB can alleviate the short-term project operation pressure, but it may affect the project revenue in the long term, and aggravate the repayment risk of the project. These analyses have uncovered the strategic role of dynamic capital structure in maintaining financial viability and avoiding project bankruptcy. This model fills a gap when we need to deal with changes through dynamic capital structures in PPP projects. Several policy implications are provided in the end for transport PPP projects to improve the survival of PPPs during project operation under revenue uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Huimin & Song, Shuang & Hu, Yi & Yan, Xue, 2020. "Monte-Carlo optimization model for dynamic capital structure adjustment in Chinese public-private partnerships under revenue uncertainty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 115-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:142:y:2020:i:c:p:115-128
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.10.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856420307485
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2020.10.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldstein, Robert & Ju, Nengjiu & Leland, Hayne, 2001. "An EBIT-Based Model of Dynamic Capital Structure," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(4), pages 483-512, October.
    2. Song, Jinbo & Zhao, Yunpeng & Jin, Lulu & Sun, Yan, 2018. "Pareto optimization of public-private partnership toll road contracts with government guarantees," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 158-175.
    3. Lev, Baruch & Pekelman, Dov, 1975. "A Multiperiod Adjustment Model for the Firm's Capital Structure," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 30(1), pages 75-91, March.
    4. Xin Chang & Sudipto Dasgupta, 2011. "Monte Carlo Simulations and Capital Structure Research," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 11(1), pages 19-55, March.
    5. Jing Du & Hongyue Wu & Ruoyu Jin, 2019. "Capital Structure of Public–Private Partnership Projects: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Alan Kraus & Ronald J. Huefner, 1972. "Cash-Flow Patterns and the Choices of a Depreciation Method," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 3(1), pages 316-334, Spring.
    7. Christensen, Peter Ove & Flor, Christian Riis & Lando, David & Miltersen, Kristian R., 2014. "Dynamic capital structure with callable debt and debt renegotiations," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 644-661.
    8. Lorenzo Riccardi, 2016. "China Accounting Standards," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-10-0006-5, September.
    9. Wolfgang Drobetz & Gabrielle Wanzenried, 2006. "What determines the speed of adjustment to the target capital structure?," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(13), pages 941-958.
    10. Jing Du & Hongyue Wu & Xianbo Zhao, 2018. "Critical Factors on the Capital Structure of Public–Private Partnership Projects: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, June.
    11. Huimin Liu & Canhui Jiang & Yan Liu & Marcel Hertogh & Xue Lyu, 2018. "Optimism Bias Evaluation and Decision-Making Risk Forecast on Bridge Project Cost Based on Reference Class Forecasting: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-29, October.
    12. Fisher, Irving, 1907. "The Rate of Interest," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number fisher1907.
    13. Shah, Salman & Thakor, Anjan V., 1987. "Optimal capital structure and project financing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 209-243, August.
    14. Song, Jinbo & Jin, Lulu & Zhao, Yunpeng & Hu, Wenjin, 2017. "Using bargaining-game model to negotiate compensation for the early termination of BOT highway projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 197-209.
    15. Jingfeng Yuan & Wenying Ji & Jiyue Guo & Mirosław J. Skibniewski, 2019. "Simulation-based dynamic adjustments of prices and subsidies for transportation PPP projects based on stakeholders’ satisfaction," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2309-2345, December.
    16. McMillan, David G. & Camara, Omar, 2012. "Dynamic capital structure adjustment: US MNCs & DCs," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 278-301.
    17. Carpintero, Samuel & Gomez-Ibañez, Jose A., 2011. "Mexico's private toll road program reconsidered," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 848-855, November.
    18. Michael Garvin & Charles Cheah, 2004. "Valuation techniques for infrastructure investment decisions," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 373-383.
    19. Miles, James A. & Ezzell, John R., 1980. "The Weighted Average Cost of Capital, Perfect Capital Markets, and Project Life: A Clarification," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 719-730, September.
    20. K.C. Iyer & Mohammed Sagheer, 2011. "A real options based traffic risk mitigation model for build-operate-transfer highway projects in India," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(8), pages 771-779, June.
    21. Drobetz, Wolfgang & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Merikas, Andreas & Schröder, Henning, 2013. "Capital structure decisions of globally-listed shipping companies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 49-76.
    22. repec:bla:jfinan:v:44:y:1989:i:1:p:19-40 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Wang, Yinglin & Gao, Huaizhu Oliver & Liu, Jicai, 2019. "Incentive game of investor speculation in PPP highway projects based on the government minimum revenue guarantee," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 20-34.
    24. Karlaftis, Matt G. & McCarthy, Patrick, 1998. "Operating subsidies and performance in public transit: an empirical study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 359-375, September.
    25. Dockner, Engelbert J. & Hartl, Richard F. & Kort, Peter M., 2019. "Dynamic capital structure choice and investment timing," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 70-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu, Hao & Liu, Dingyi & Xiao, Chengyou & Zhang, Cheng & Du, Xiaosen, 2024. "Rethinking highway finance: A data-driven pricing model for concession securities in chongqing, China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Andrey Kulikov & Naief Alabed Alkader & Galina Panaedova & Aleksandr Ogorodnikov & Evgenii Rebeka, 2023. "Modelling Optimal Capital Structure in Gas and Oil Sector by Applying Simulation Theory and Programming Language of Python (Qatar Gas Transport Company)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Zhaoyang & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "Effects of asymmetric investment cost information on revenue-compensated build-operate-transfer highway contracts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 71-92.
    2. Fischer, Max & Krause, Marko & Lahmann, Alexander & Stimper, Franziska, 2022. "Firm valuation with state dependent COD taxation," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 550-561.
    3. Lu, Hao & Liu, Dingyi & Xiao, Chengyou & Zhang, Cheng & Du, Xiaosen, 2024. "Rethinking highway finance: A data-driven pricing model for concession securities in chongqing, China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Frantz, Pascal & Instefjord, Norvald, 2019. "Debt overhang and non-distressed debt restructuring," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 75-88.
    5. Frantz, Pascal & Instefjord, Norvald, 2019. "Debt overhang and non-distressed debt restructuring," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90212, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Marc Arnold & Ramona Westermann, 2023. "Debt Renegotiations Outside Distress," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(4), pages 1183-1228.
    7. G. Oka Warmana & I. Ketut Rahyuda & Ida Bagus Anom Purbawangsa & Ni Luh Gede Sri Artini, 2020. "Investigating Capital Structure Speed of Adjustment (SOA) of Indonesian Companies for Corporate Value," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 215-231, September.
    8. Ilya A. Strebulaev, 2007. "Do Tests of Capital Structure Theory Mean What They Say?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(4), pages 1747-1787, August.
    9. Schosser, Josef, 2008. "Bewertung ohne "Kapitalkosten": Ein arbitragetheoretischer Ansatz zu Unternehmenswert, Kapitalstruktur und persönlicher Besteuerung," Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Betriebswirtschaftliche Reihe 13, University of Passau, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    10. Stavros H. Arvanitis & Irakleia S. Tzigkounaki & Theodoros V. Stamatopoulos & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2012. "Dynamic Approach of Capital Structure of European Shipping Companies," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 5(3), pages 33-63, December.
    11. Wei He & NyoNyo A Kyaw, 2023. "Macroeconomic risks and capital structure adjustment speed: The Chinese evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2885-2899, July.
    12. Alexander Kurshev & Ilya A. Strebulaev, 2015. "Firm Size and Capital Structure," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 1-46, September.
    13. Jing Du & Hongyue Wu & Ruoyu Jin, 2019. "Capital Structure of Public–Private Partnership Projects: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-25, June.
    14. Guofeng Ma & Qingjuan Du & Kedi Wang, 2018. "A Concession Period and Price Determination Model for PPP Projects: Based on Real Options and Risk Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Rainer Baule, 2019. "The cost of debt capital revisited," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 721-753, December.
    16. Dang, Tung Lam & Dang, Viet Anh & Moshirian, Fariborz & Nguyen, Lily & Zhang, Bohui, 2019. "News media coverage and corporate leverage adjustments," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Huige Xing & Yuelin Li & Hongyang Li, 2020. "Renegotiation Strategy of Public-Private Partnership Projects with Asymmetric Information—An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, March.
    18. Bugalia, Nikhil & Maemura, Yu & Dasari, Rohit & Patidar, Manoj, 2023. "A system dynamics model for effective management strategies of High-Speed Railway (HSR) projects involving private sector participation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    19. Elena Alexandra Nenu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2018. "The Impact of Capital Structure on Risk and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence for the Bucharest Stock Exchange Listed Companies," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-29, April.
    20. Robert Couch & Michael Dothan & Wei Wu, 2012. "Interest Tax Shields: A Barrier Options Approach," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 123-146, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:142:y:2020:i:c:p:115-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.