IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v122y2019icp125-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulatory challenges for road vehicle automation: Lessons from the California experience

Author

Listed:
  • Shladover, Steven E.
  • Nowakowski, Christopher

Abstract

The development of automated driving systems presents a special challenge to the existing regulatory regimes for road vehicles. Automated driving systems shift the responsibility for roadway and traffic monitoring, decision making, and vehicle control from the driver to the automated driving system, which will necessitate a shift of the responsibility for traffic law violations and crashes from the individual driver toward the manufacturers of the automated driving systems. However, the opportunities for automated driving systems to improve transportation system performance and safety are great, and rapid innovation needs to be balanced against the risks to public safety from poorly engineered or hastily released systems competing for first-on-the-market status. Furthermore, in the absence of clearly defined standards and testing procedures, it is not yet clear how safety can be certified by the developer, a regulatory agency, or a third party. This paper describes California’s pioneering efforts to grapple with these challenges after its legislature passed a law requiring the development of regulations to govern the testing and operation of automated vehicles on public roads, and it provides recommendations regarding what should and should not be incorporated into such regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Shladover, Steven E. & Nowakowski, Christopher, 2019. "Regulatory challenges for road vehicle automation: Lessons from the California experience," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 125-133.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:122:y:2019:i:c:p:125-133
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856417300952
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoo, Sunbin & Kumagai, Junya & Kawabata, Yuta & Keeley, Alexander & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Willingness to Buy and/or Pay Disparity: Evidence from Fully Autonomous Vehicles," MPRA Paper 108882, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Schepis, Daniel & Purchase, Sharon & Olaru, Doina & Smith, Brett & Ellis, Nick, 2023. "How governments influence autonomous vehicle (AV) innovation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Qida Su & David Z. W. Wang, 2021. "Spatial parking planning design with mixed conventional and autonomous vehicles," Papers 2104.01773, arXiv.org.
    4. Hansson, Lisa, 2020. "Regulatory governance in emerging technologies: The case of autonomous vehicles in Sweden and Norway," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Lee, Dasom & Hess, David J., 2020. "Regulations for on-road testing of connected and automated vehicles: Assessing the potential for global safety harmonization," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 85-98.
    6. Feess, Eberhard & Muehlheusser, Gerd, 2024. "Autonomous Vehicles: Moral dilemmas and adoption incentives," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:122:y:2019:i:c:p:125-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.