IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v84y2013icp36-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A theoretical study of the role of spatial population structure in the evolution of parasite virulence

Author

Listed:
  • Webb, Steven D.
  • Keeling, Matt J.
  • Boots, Mike

Abstract

The rich theory of infectious disease modelling using the Susceptible–Infectious–Recovered (SIR) framework is mainly based on the assumption of a well-mixed population, under which evolutionary behaviours (typically derived using adaptive dynamics) are shown to depend critically on the qualitative features of a virulence-transmission trade-off. Spatial extensions of this work, using simulation studies, show multiple evolutionary outcomes, which strongly depend on trade-off shape and, additionally, the length scale of the infectious process. In this paper, we aim to shed analytical insight into the mechanisms underlying these spatial evolutionary outcomes. In particular, why there is a qualitative difference observed in the evolutionary predicted virulence rates between linear and decelerating trade-offs between transmission and virulence and how recovery can weaken the effect of space. We use both pair approximations and cellular automata to model the spatial populations and the analysis exploits small neighbourhood variations in the spatial settings. The evolutionary outcomes are derived using adaptive dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Webb, Steven D. & Keeling, Matt J. & Boots, Mike, 2013. "A theoretical study of the role of spatial population structure in the evolution of parasite virulence," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 36-45.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:84:y:2013:i:c:p:36-45
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.11.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580912001244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2012.11.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:84:y:2013:i:c:p:36-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.