IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v82y2012i3p147-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gametophytic vs. sporophytic control of pollen aperture number: A generational conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Till-Bottraud, Irène
  • Gouyon, Pierre-Henri
  • Ressayre, Adrienne
  • Godelle, Bernard

Abstract

In flowering plants, the haploid phase is reduced to the pollen grain and embryo sac. These reproductive tissues (gametophytes) are actually distinct individuals that have a different genome from the plant (sporophyte), and are more or less independent. The morphology of pollen grains, particularly the openings permitting pollen tube germination (apertures), is crucial for determining the outcome of pollen competition. Many species of flowering plants simultaneously produce pollen grains with different aperture numbers in a single individual (heteromorphism). In this paper, we show that the heteromorphic pollen aperture pattern depends on the genetic control of pollen morphogenesis. This points out a conflict of interest between genes expressed in the sporophyte and genes expressed in the gametophyte. More generally, such a conflict should exist whenever heteromorphism is an ESS resulting from a bet-hedging strategy. For pollen aperture, heteromorphism has been observed in about 40% of angiosperm species, suggesting that conflicting situations are the rule. In this context, the sporo–gametophytic conflict could be one of the factors that led to the reduction of the haploid phase in plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Till-Bottraud, Irène & Gouyon, Pierre-Henri & Ressayre, Adrienne & Godelle, Bernard, 2012. "Gametophytic vs. sporophytic control of pollen aperture number: A generational conflict," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 147-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:82:y:2012:i:3:p:147-157
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.06.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004058091200072X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2012.06.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:82:y:2012:i:3:p:147-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.