IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v73y2008i2p212-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the inadmissibility of Watterson’s estimator

Author

Listed:
  • Futschik, Andreas
  • Gach, Florian

Abstract

We consider the estimation of the scaled mutation parameter θ, which is one of the parameters of key interest in population genetics. We provide a general result showing when estimators of θ can be improved using shrinkage when taking the mean squared error as the measure of performance. As a consequence, we show that Watterson’s estimator is inadmissible, and propose an alternative shrinkage-based estimator that is easy to calculate and has a smaller mean squared error than Watterson’s estimator for all possible parameter values 0<θ<∞. This estimator is admissible in the class of all linear estimators. We then derive improved versions for other estimators of θ, including the MLE. We also investigate how an improvement can be obtained both when combining information from several independent loci and when explicitly taking into account recombination. A simulation study provides information about the amount of improvement achieved by our alternative estimators.

Suggested Citation

  • Futschik, Andreas & Gach, Florian, 2008. "On the inadmissibility of Watterson’s estimator," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 212-221.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:73:y:2008:i:2:p:212-221
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2007.11.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580907001323
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2007.11.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:73:y:2008:i:2:p:212-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.