IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v158y2024icp121-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Muller’s ratchet in a near-critical regime: Tournament versus fitness proportional selection

Author

Listed:
  • Igelbrink, J.L.
  • González Casanova, A.
  • Smadi, C.
  • Wakolbinger, A.

Abstract

Muller’s ratchet, in its prototype version, models a haploid, asexual population whose size N is constant over the generations. Slightly deleterious mutations are acquired along the lineages at a constant rate, and individuals carrying less mutations have a selective advantage. The classical variant considers fitness proportional selection, but other fitness schemes are conceivable as well. Inspired by the work of Etheridge et al. (2009) we propose a parameter scaling which fits well to the “near-critical†regime that was in the focus of Etheridge et al. (2009) (and in which the mutation–selection ratio diverges logarithmically as N→∞). Using a Moran model, we investigate the“rule of thumb†given in Etheridge et al. (2009) for the click rate of the “classical ratchet†by putting it into the context of new results on the long-time evolution of the size of the best class of the ratchet with (binary) tournament selection. This variant of Muller’s ratchet was introduced in González Casanova et al. (2023), and was analysed there in a subcritical parameter regime. Other than that of the classical ratchet, the size of the best class of the tournament ratchet follows an autonomous dynamics up to the time of its extinction. It turns out that, under a suitable correspondence of the model parameters, this dynamics coincides with the so called Poisson profile approximation of the dynamics of the best class of the classical ratchet.

Suggested Citation

  • Igelbrink, J.L. & González Casanova, A. & Smadi, C. & Wakolbinger, A., 2024. "Muller’s ratchet in a near-critical regime: Tournament versus fitness proportional selection," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 121-138.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:158:y:2024:i:c:p:121-138
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2024.06.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580924000613
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2024.06.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:158:y:2024:i:c:p:121-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.