IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v3y1979i3p209-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The UK telecommunications monopoly : An independent view

Author

Listed:
  • Lamond, Frederic E.

Abstract

The author assesses how much of the UK Post Office monopoly is 'natural', and how much is purely statutory and could be replaced by conditions of free and open competition. He also considers the historical reasons behind the PO's purely statutory monopolies, and the extent to which they remain desirable from the point of view of the public interest at a time of rapid technological change. Finally, he examines the implications for the health of the European computer, telecommunications and electronic industries of the growing divergence between European leased communications line costs and costs in North America.

Suggested Citation

  • Lamond, Frederic E., 1979. "The UK telecommunications monopoly : An independent view," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 209-216, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:3:y:1979:i:3:p:209-216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0308596179900041
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:3:y:1979:i:3:p:209-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.